Integrated Oil and Gas: Investing Essentials

0 comments
If you were to transport someone from 100 years ago to today, he or she would not recognize much, except perhaps the oil and gas industry. The basic principles of this industry have remained the same over the last century, and the largest players in the space --ExxonMobil, Chevron, Royal Dutch Shell -- were just as prominent then as they are now.  

Despite initiatives such as electric vehicles and alternative energy generation, oil and gas remain critical pillars of the global economy and will likely remain that way for many years to come. Since they are such critical aspects to our everyday lives, integrated oil and gas companies are an ideal place for long-term investors to park their money and not worry about it for decades. Why else would Warren Buffet invest billions in ExxonMobil?

Integrated oil and gas companies look like difficult companies to analyze, but in reality just a couple select areas are key for monitoring the health of the industry or a company. Let's take a brief look at this industry and what you absolutely need to know about it before investing a single dollar in the space. 

What is the integrated oil and gas industry?

There are several names for this particular industry -- Big Oil, super majors, integrated majors -- but essentially any company that is considered part of this space deals with the entire value chain of oil and gas. Their roles stretch from finding the initial oil or gas reservoir all the way to putting gasoline in your vehicle to supplying natural gas to your local utility. They have assets related to exploring and drilling for new sources of hydrocarbons, pipelines and other transportation infrastructure, refining and petrochemical manufacturing, and retail sales from the gas stations we see all over the place.

The concept of the integrated oil and gas company began in the 1890s with the formation of the Standard Oil Trust. Many of today's integrated oil and gas companies, including ExxonMobil, Chevron, and Amoco (now part of BP), emerged when Standard Oil was broken up by the Sherman Antitrust Act in 1911. Today, integrated oil and gas companies have operations on every continent aside from Antarctica, and spend billions of dollars every year to grow production. You can bet that once someone finds oil or gas somewhere in the world, integrated oil and gas companies will be the first to set up shop.  

How big is integrated oil and gas in the world of oil?

The global oil and gas market is complex. It involves publicly traded companies that can operate in just one sub-industry, or they can be behemoth national oil companies that are responsible for every hydrocarbon molecule in that particular country from the day it is taken from the ground to the day it is exported or consumed. ExxonMobil is one of the largest integrated oil and gas company, with a market capitalization of nearly half a trillion dollars; however, it's still only the fourth-largest oil company in the world, behind a few of these national oil giants.

Since integrated oil and gas companies have their fingers in so many pies, it's difficult to give a full market size when compared to the entire oil and gas market. Instead, here are a few factoids that will give an idea of their size and scale. The 10 largest integrated oil and gas companies traded on the U.S. stock exchanges are responsible for approximately one-fifth of the world's oil and gas production and nearly one-fourth of global refining capacity. 

How does the integrated oil and gas industry work? 

Integrated oil and gas companies operate in several business segments. Here is a brief description of each segment of the business:

Exploration and production units -- known as the upstream side of the business -- extract hydrocarbons from the ground and sell them to refineries and petrochemical manufacturers under either supply contracts or on the spot market.
Pipelines and other transportation infrastructure segments - called the midstream business -- charge fees to move or store crude oil, natural gas, or even refined products. These fees are normally based on long-term contracts.
Refining and petrochemical manufacturing operations -- called the downstream business -- produce the usable products from crude, ranging from gasoline and diesel to plastics and asphalt, and get profit on the margins between the price of crude and the price of refined products.
Retail and marketing units -- also part of the downstream business -- buy from refiners and then sell to companies and everyday consumers through wholesale contracts or retail purchases at gas stations.
Since production at integrated oil and gas companies is so large, they have to bring on hundreds of thousands of barrels per day of new production just to replace the declining production at older wells. This means they take on huge development projects that can cost billions of dollars. As the easy-to-access oil and gas reservoirs have become fewer and farther between, the per-barrel development costs of these projects have been slowly eating at the rates of returns of these companies for the past several years. 

What are the drivers of integrated oil and gas?

The price of oil and gas, plain and simple.

OK, so that is probably a little too simplistic, but it is by far the most important driver of their business. All integrated oil and gas companies generate at least 75% of their total profits from oil and gas drilling and production. For these companies, a $1 change in the price of Brent crude -- the international benchmark price -- can alter hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of net operating income. This means that just about every decision related to capital allocation is linked to the price of oil and gas. 

There are way too many things that can impact the price of oil on a daily, weekly, or even monthly basis to keep track of, and correctly predicting that price is just dumb luck. So for investors, it's better to focus on two simple things: demand and development costs. Global oil demand has grown 2.2% on a compounded annual basis since 1965; that growth level appears likely to persist for many years, as demand in non-OECD countries is expected to double between now and 2030. Oil demand is basically the bellwether for economic health, so as long as global economic health is maintained, oil demand will increase.

Development costs will be the major determining factor in profitability for an individual company. There are plenty of sources of oil out there, but it is becoming more expensive to develop them, and several companies in the space have seen major development project costs blow past original estimates. These expenses can have a profound impact on the return on capital for these companies, so investors should keep a watchful eye on whether companies are delivering new projects on time and on or near budget. 

Source: Motley fool

City Gas to lower household gas prices from Aug to Oct

0 comments
The gas tariff for households using City Gas will decrease by 0.1 per cent from next month until the end of October.

City Gas, which supplies town gas to almost 90 per cent of residents living in new Housing Development Board estates and private properties, said that the gas tariff for households will decrease from 21.08 cents per kilowatt hour (kWh) to 21.06 cents per kWh.

This is due to a drop in fuel costs compared to the previous quarter.

City Gas reviews the gas tariff based on guidelines set by the Energy Market Authority (EMA), the gas industry regulator.









Source: todayonline

Natural gas could reshape global energy landscape

0 comments
New innovations in the extraction of natural gas, particularly from shale, have dramatically increased world reserves. Now it looks like a long-term boom in both the supply and demand for natural gas could reshape the global energy landscape.

Pierre Fournier, analyst at National Bank Financial, points to several trends, such as the increasing transportation of liquefied natural gas (LNG), growing demand for gas in both China and India and the worldwide expansion of infrastructure for drilling and pipelines.

Recent developments seem to strengthen the case for gas, including the current instability in the Middle East, which could drive countries to diversify away from oil.

Other trends are converging, like the emergence of Mexico as a gas superpower and a continued transition away from coal in the U.S.

Transportation is the only industrial sector where natural gas is not widely used but that’s poised to change, Fournier noted in a report to clients this week.

According to The International Energy Agency, the share of natural gas in transportation will double over the next five years.

While more than 90 per cent of the world’s transportation fleet is still powered by oil, the need for natural gas will become more pressing as the number of light-duty vehicles in the world is expected to double over the next 25 years.

So far, costs and lack of supporting infrastructure have held back the adoption of natural-gas vehicles. There are 15 million in use worldwide, including just 142,000 in the United States.

With these vehicles often costing thousands of dollars more than conventionally fuelled ones, it can take five to eight years for purchasers to recoup upfront costs. And fuelling stations are hard to find.

The prospects are much brighter in the bus and trucking sectors, the analyst says. Unlike passenger vehicles, local fleets owned by governments and companies can refuel at a central depot. A fifth of America’s buses now run on natural gas as do a growing number of garbage trucks and delivery trucks operated by courier companies like UPS and FedEx.

“A significant switch to natural gas in the trucking sector would have a major impact on America’s oil consumption.”

Even the growing trend for plug-in electric vehicles will benefit natural gas because it is used to generate electricity*.

Another sector where natural gas should make inroads is shipping, because of new regulations on sulphur emissions that govern ships operating within 200 miles of the coast. Most ships now use unrefined crude, which contributes substantially to pollution emissions.

Regulations in Europe and North America mandate reductions of 20 per cent in sulphur emissions by 2020 and 50 per cent by 2050.

The real potential for growth in the use of natural gas is in China, where reducing the country’s dependence on oil is an environmental and economic necessity. Emissions from vehicles and coal-fired power plants are the main contributors to the pollution and smog that plague Chinese cities.

The sulphur levels produced by diesel trucks alone are at least 23 times worse than those in the United States, according to one estimate. The number of cars on China’s roads is set to increase by five times within the next 15 years.

It’s the world’s largest oil importer so China sees natural gas as a way to reduce its huge oil bill. It already has about ten times as many natural gas vehicles on the road as the U.S. and government planners have set lofty goals for continued growth in vehicles, fuelling stations and gas-fired power plants.

The big issue is geopolitical risk. “Unrest in the Middle East will help keep oil prices high and provide added motivation for countries to diversify their energy consumption away from oil,” the analyst says.

Major producers like Iraq, Libya, Nigeria and Sudan are experiencing political turmoil, while future oil output in Russia and Sudan is clouded by sanctions.

All this raises interesting issues for Canada’s natural gas sector. As a result of massive discoveries in the U.S., natural gas exports to the U.S. are at their lowest level in nearly 20 years.

The Canadian gas industry needs new markets and will turn increasingly towards LNG terminals and markets in Asia, Fournier predicts.

Source: montrealgazette.com

Committee of Secretaries approves gas policy rejig; city gas firms like Indraprastha Gas to get priority

0 comments
A Committee of Secretaries has approved a rejig of natural gas allocation policy, giving city gas distribution firms like Indraprastha Gas Ltd top priority for allocation of domestically produced fuel. 

The CoS approved a proposal of Oil Ministry for changes in priority ranking for gas allocation, official sources said. The issue will now go to the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs ( CCEA) for final approval. 

At present, urea-manufacturing fertiliser plants have the first right over the domestically produced gas, followed by liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) plants and power stations. City gas distribution (CGD) projects are ranked fourth in the priority list. 

The CoS agreed to change this priority listing to give CGD firms like IGL, which sells CNG to automobiles and piped gas to households in the national capital, top priority, they said. 

CGD firms like IGL currently get 8.32 million standard cubic meters per day of gas out of total domestic supplies of about 77 mmscmd. 

As city gas projects get rolled out in new cities, the requirement of the sector will grow and so the government is now giving it top priority. 

Sources said compressed natural gas (CNG) and piped natural gas (PNG) are clean fuels and will help replace subsidised diesel in automobiles and LPG in households respectively. 

According to the new allocation policy, additional requirement for CGD will be first met by imposing proportionate cuts in the domestic gas presently being supplied to sectors other than priority sectors as decided by the Oil Ministry. 

Plants providing inputs to strategic sectors of atomic energy and space research will get the second priority, followed by plants that can extract higher fractions from natural gas. 

Gas-based urea plants will rank fourth in the priority list and power stations fifth. 

Since domestic gas production is now stagnant, it is being proposed to freeze allocation to all sectors expect CGD and LPG sector, at supply levels of 2013-14. 

In 2013-14, fertiliser plants received 29.79 mmscmd of gas. Power plants got 25.59 mmscmd while LPG extraction plants received 1.83 mmscmd. Petrochemical plants received 3.32 mmscmd while refineries got 1.89 mmscmd and steel plants 1.32 mmscmd. 

Sources said incremental production from NELP blocks like KG-D6 and Gujarat State Petroleum Corp's (GSPC) Deendayal gas will be allocated as per the decision taken in the meeting of an Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) on August 23, 2013. 

The EGoM had decided that incremental gas would go to power plants. 

The requirement of CGD project is quite small compared to power and fertiliser sectors and can be met through proportionate cuts, they said. 

Source: ET

Expert group may be set up to study gas pricing

0 comments
The government plans to consult a group of eminent people possibly led by former minister Suresh Prabhu or a "specialised agency" to review natural gas pricing, including the UPA-approved Rangarajan Formula that would have doubled gas rates to $8.4 per unit in April if the Election Commission had not vetoed it.

Some officials say engaging organisations having "generic expertise" in this matter would be time consuming and the government would miss the September 30 deadline, hence a committee under Prabhu should be asked to revisit the entire gas pricing issue. Other names proposed for the panel are Pratap Bhanu Mehta, chief executive of the Centre for Policy Research, and Bibek Debroy, a faculty member in the same institution.

The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs on June 25 decided to "comprehensively review" the issues related with gas pricing in public interest, and asked gas producers to keep selling at the old price of $4.2 per unit until the end of September.

Officials familiar with the matter said the task is enormous and efforts would be made to ensure that the job is completed quickly, so that the government can take a decision before the end of September.

The government is studying various aspects of gas pricing including Reliance's move to initiate arbitration against the government on the issue of delay in implanting the Rangarajan formula. Also, the Supreme Court is hearing a public-interest litigation on the matter. In this background, the oil ministry may consult the law ministry's opinion before taking any decisive step, official sources said.

Source: ET

Energy security India’s top priority: Sutherland

0 comments
Energy Security is India’s top priority now, which is why the India-Canada Energy Forum was convened jointly by Canada-India Business Council (C-IBC), Alberta School of Business (University of Calgary) and India’s Petrotech, in Calgary July 17-18.

The forum, C-IBC President Peter Sutherland said, brought together leaders and experts from both countries to discuss oil and gas investment, crude oil trading and refining, unconventional gas development and oil and gas sourcing from Canada.

In an exclusive interview to The Indian Diaspora, Sutherland, former Canadian High Commissioner to India, said 34 high profile delegates from oil industry and allied sectors came from India. They included Petrotech President, Rahul Dhir, Director-General Ashok Anand and Managing Director and CEO, Dr AK Baylan.

They also included Akhil Verma, of ONGC Videsh Ltd, Anand Kumnar, Director, Petrotech, Debasis Basu, General Manager (Production) of ONGC and Darshan Hiranandani, Director of Hydrocarbon Energy.

Indian companies represented at the forum included Hydrocarbon Energy; Oil and Natural Gas Commission, Indian Oil Company, Petronet, Indian Oil Corporation and ONGC Videsh Ltd.

From the Canadian side, there were representatives of Industry Canada, Natural Resources Canada, Government of Alberta and several oil companies, Trans Canada, Alberta Petroleum Marketing Commission, Irving Oil, Canadian Society of Unconventional Resources, Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, etc.

India has now become fourth largest energy consumer in the world, after China, the United States and Russia. “Its need for energy supply continues to climb as a result of the country’s dynamic economic growth and modernization over the past several years,” the US Energy Information Administration says in its June “India” profile.

In the International Outlook 2013, International Energy Agency projects that India and China will “account for about half of global energy demand growth through 2040, with India’s energy demand growing at 2.8% per year.”

It is because of this growing demand, Sutherland says, Indian oil companies have purchased equity stakes in oil and gas fields in many countries. Along the line, Canada is encouraging Indian oil companies to invest in Canadian oil and natural gas and energy sectors, as the investment in Canada is secure, there’s security of the energy sector, of oil and gas sector in Canada.

C-IBC joined hands with the Calgary School of Business and Petrotech of India to organize this forum? 

Yes. We were happy that 34 high-profile people came from India. The forum was part of the program of the University of Alberta Business School. And C-IBC and Petrotech co-sponsored the forum. That was the core group. Then there were executives of some Indian companies and several Canadian companies and some individuals as well in the area.

And what was the main objective of organizing this forum?

The main objective was to seek opportunities and dialogues about ongoing energy discussions between India and Canada. We had the first Canada-India Energy Forum in May last year. And then in November at the business forum in India, we had another discussion on energy, and now this was the third round. Our idea is to continue with the dialogue and get more Indian and Canadian companies talking and working together in this field.

This forum was fallout of former Minister of Natural Resources Joe Oliver’s visit to India in January when he extensively spoke about energy security?

As I said, energy security is a very important issue for India. And in Canada, we are looking for new markets. Our market so far is the United States. So, it is a natural fit – we are looking for new markets and India needs so much energy – oil and gas, LNG – expertise in services. We can cooperate.

India is importing 70 per cent of its energy requirements?

India is importing 70 percent of its oil consumption. Oil comes from the Middle East. They want to diversify it.

For Canada to export oil to India, distance becomes a negative factor.

Oil from the East Coast, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, is more economical than from the West Coast. The first shipment of the Canadian oil to India was in January from the East Coast.

How much oil Canada is exporting to India?

That was the first shipment and so far the only shipment of oil to India. Oil from Alberta will be shipped to the East Coast by pipelines and it could then be exported to India.

What did visitors from India suggest?

There’s very strong potential, oil and natural gas... what they are looking for is to get oil from Alberta to East Coast to West Coast. All of our export of oil so far is to the United States.

You are also encouraging Indian companies, like Oil and Natural Gas Commission to buy energy assets here?

We are encouraging Indian companies to come and invest in Canada in oil and gas sectors. We can expand our relationship in the energy market. Secondly, we want to cooperate with India... We can explore the third (world) markets together. Canadian expertise and technology and together with India, we can explore African and some other markets.

So much is being said about the Modi’s government being pro-business. How optimistic you are that Canada will be able to expand its business relationship with India?

I am very optimistic. It is a majority government and that makes all the difference. There won’t be any hindrance at the political level in the new government being able to pursue its agenda, its own policies. They can take action. It is pro-business. Indian companies thus are assured to internalize their business. I think it all augurs well from the business perspective.

What about the comprehensive Free Trade Agreement?

I hope they will resume the discussions. Mr Modi is being briefed on this file. It is a good time for the Canadian side to take initiative (so) that discussion resumes.

How far the discussions have actually reached?

They had eight rounds of negotiations. Things came to a standstill because of the election.
These negotiations should resume soon.

Source: theindiandiaspora.com/

India's RIL making more from US shale gas than domestic production

0 comments
India’s Reliance Industries Limited is doing exceptionally well when it comes to its shale gas business in the US, from which it garnered a revenue of INR 1,617 crore in the first quarter of the current financial year, compared to INR 1,557 crore from domestic oil and gas production.

Reliance has also become the first company in the private sector in India to post USD 1 billion net profit in a quarter.

According to a press release:

Reliance’s Shale Gas business continued on its growth path. During 1Q FY15, revenues were at USD 270 million and EBITDA was at USD 201 million reflecting Y-o-Y growth of 26% and 22% respectively.

Net sales volume (Reliance share) stood at 41.4 BCFe, up 28% Y-o-Y and 10% Q-o-Q. Sequential growth in revenue and profits were impacted by higher basis differentials for natural gas and condensate. This was partially offset by lower operating costs.

Gross JV production is now averaging above 1 Bcfe/day and Reliance share of production at 48.6 Bcfe in 1Q FY15. Strong growth in production was driven by impressive rise in producing well count and continued strong well performance across JVs.

Pioneer JV continued on liquid focused development in Eagle Ford, producing 676Mmcfe/d (including ~64,500 bbl/d of condensate) at gross JV level. Production at Chevron Marcellus JV stayed strong at 312 Mmcfe/d, while improvement in midstream situation and market conditions enabled production at Carrizo to reach new levels of 176 Mmcfe/d during the quarter.

Overall capex for the quarter was at $ 331 million and cumulative investment across all JVs stands at $ 7.36 billion. Substantial part of Pioneer and Carrizo JV capex are met through cash from respective JV operations. Chevron JV capex continues to account for the substantial part of funding needs.

Source: youroilandgasnews.com

GE likely to invest over Rs3,000 crore in India

0 comments
Keeping an eye on reforms and the new government’s focus towards manufacturing and infrastructure development in the country, US conglomerate General Electric could look at investing another $500 million or more (Rs3,000 crore-plus) in manufacturing, transportation and oil and gas in India.

GE, with interest in energy, transport, aviation and healthcare, has 13 manufacturing facilities in India, the latest being the $200-million Pune unit. It employs over 13,000 people in the country.

In an exclusive interview to HT, vice chairman John Rice said the company is looking to expand its manufacturing activities in India, either through brownfield expansion at its Pune plant for by putting up a greenfield facility in some other state.

“We are looking at expanding our manufacturing facilities. As we have the Pune facility up and running, we are thinking about the next phase,” he said.

“I don’t think $200 million is too little... it’s just the first step and there is plenty of room to expand... we want to take advantage of the Pune facility, but it doesn’t have to be Pune. There are some other states that want to create jobs, so we are not going to limit ourselves,” he added.

The company may also revive its investment plans of $300 million or more into rail freight modernisation.

“There was this couple of million dollar investment associated with freight rail modernisation. That’s been on hold for the better part of 10 years. We haven’t done anything because the project hasn’t moved forward. Investment by GE would depend if the new government decides to move forward with the freight modernisation programme,” he said.

Stating that GE was awaiting the government’s final decision on gas pricing, Rice said: “We are also looking at partnerships and joint ventures (in the oil and gas sector). We are waiting to get clarity on the price of gas... there is $10-15 billion of investment awaiting.”

Source: HT

Reliance profits improve due to oil and gas unit

0 comments
INDIAN conglomerate Reliance Industries posted a 13.7 per cent jump in net profit to $1bn (£590m) for the first quarter of the financial year, thanks to an improved performance in its oil and gas exploration division.

The company, which is controlled by India’s richest man Mukesh Ambani, said on the weekend that revenue had risen by 7.2 per cent to $17.9bn.

“Reliance has delivered a record level of consolidated net profit this quarter. This was achieved despite weak regional refining margins and a planned turnaround in our refinery,” said Ambani. “The petrochemicals business performance highlights the strength of our portfolio-mix and end-market diversity.”

Dwindling production rates and regulatory issues with India’s government have hindered the progress of Reliance’s oil and gas exploration unit.

But in the last quarter pre-tax earnings for its oil and gas division soared 114.4 per cent year-on-year, due to a strong performance from its US shale business.

Source: City AM

RUSSIAN PIPELINE TO INDIA – ANALYSIS

0 comments
The idea of an overland pipeline bringing hydrocarbons from Russia to India has been around for a while. Mooted under UPA rule, the proposal is gaining some traction with the NDA government. New Delhi and Moscow are looking for some big new projects to boost their stagnant commercial ties. Annual bilateral trade now hovers below a paltry $15 billion. Given the massive complementarities in the energy sector, the two sides rightly focus on making this the centrepiece of a stronger economic partnership in future.
The Great Game Folio

Talks on Russian atomic reactor exports are making slow progress amidst the continuing differences over the application of India’s nuclear liability act. As India’s demand for oil and natural gas grows, the hydrocarbon sector presents itself as a major strategic opportunity. India already has $5bn invested in the Russian petroleum sector. India also imports crude oil worth nearly $200 million every year.

India would like to import a lot more and the idea of building a direct pipeline from Russia, therefore, has become an object of political interest in Delhi and Moscow. Further impetus for the project has come from a recent Russian deal with China to export natural gas worth $400bn over a 30-year period via a new pipeline. The idea is generating some excitement and is expected to figure in the bilateral talks between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Russian President Vladimir Putin on the margins of the BRICS summit in Brazil.

Luckless India

It is easy drawing pipeline routes on the map. India knows that building them on the ground is not. For none of the pipeline projects that India has debated in the last two decades has taken off for reasons of costs, geopolitical and financial. There have been many proposals to build underwater pipelines from the Gulf to India; but cost considerations have put them on hold. Overland pipeline projects have been grounded mainly for geopolitical reasons. The plan to build the

Iran-Pakistan-India (IPI) pipeline has run into strong opposition from the United States, which remains opposed to any projects involving Tehran. India, Pakistan and Afghanistan have spent much time negotiating the TAPI pipeline that would have brought natural gas from Turkmenistan into the subcontinent. Given the security problems in the Af-Pak region, it has been hard selling the project to international bankers.

There was a plan to build a natural gas pipeline between Myanmar and India through Bangladesh. But the inability of Delhi and Dhaka to act fast saw Myanmar deciding to sell the gas to China. Beijing moved rapidly to build a twin pipeline system from the Bay of Bengal coast to the Yunnan province in southwestern China, just north of Myanmar.

Any Russian pipeline from Russia to India will have three possible routes into India. One is via Iran and Pakistan; another must traverse Afghanistan and Pakistan; and the third must come through China. The option of bringing them through Pakistan will face many of the same problems as the IPI and TAPI pipelines. The China option involves bringing the pipeline across the Great Himalayas and through the regions of Jammu and Kashmir that are part of the territorial dispute between Delhi and Beijing.

Lahore beckons

In a paradox, the only pipeline that could get off the ground in the near term is the one that would run out of India rather than into it. Delhi has been discussing with Islamabad for some time now plans to build a pipeline to the Punjab border to export liquefied natural gas to Pakistan.

Given the shortage of LNG infrastructure in Pakistan, it makes sense for Islamabad to import natural gas into Lahore from across the Radcliffe Line. In the budget presented to the Lok Sabha last week, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley exempted from customs duty the LNG that will be imported into India and then exported to Pakistan. Although this decision will cut the import costs for Islamabad, the Nawaz Sharif government may not have the freedom to act in Pakistan’s enlightened economic self-interest.

From the Indian perspective, though, the Modi government would be wise to focus on connecting India’s hydrocarbon grids with those of the immediate neighbours. Given its vast coastline, Delhi should devote its attention for now to importing hydrocarbons by sea, investing in equity oil in Russia and other energy-rich countries, and concluding swap arrangements rather than grandiose transregional pipelines.

Source: euraisareview

India pondering natural gas safety board

0 comments
India may create a natural gas safety board in the wake of the June 27 pipeline explosion that killed 19.
According to India’s Press Information Bureau, the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas is considering the formation of a Petroleum and Natural Gas Industry Safety Board.
It said the recent disaster at the GAIL pipeline in Andhra Pradesh has led to GAIL (India) Ltd. taking several preventative actions, including:
• Benchmarking of standard operating processes by global operators.
• Creation of a pipeline health group to monitor integrity and safety.
• Increased frequency of internal cleaning.
• Intense technical audits of operations and maintenance by statutory authorities.
• Increased frequency of various monitoring activities.

Source: OGJ

Oil ministry plans to reduce energy imports from Gulf countries, turns to Russia for fuel

0 comments
The oil ministry has chalked out a strategy to gradually reduce energy sourcing from politically volatile countries in the Gulf region and explore importing natural gas from Russia, Iran and CIS countries, government sources said.

In a recent presentation to the prime minister, the oil ministry also proposed a new regime to manage oil-field contracts. In the current system the contractor recovers costs before sharing profit with the government. In the proposed system, the two sides share revenues from the day production starts. "The matter is under active consideration of the government," one source said.

Officials say the simpler new regime should minimize state interference in oil-field affairs and boost private investment, leading to higher output and better energy security.

To improve energy security, oil ministry officials say the country should avoid heavy dependence on oil and look at opportunities to import natural gas from all possible sources.

"Russia is one such potential supplier. We may import natural gas from the country either in liquid form or through a pipeline. A strategy paper is being prepared after the visit of Petroleum Minister Dharmendra Pradhan to the country last month," one government official said.

India has warm relations with Russia, which is the world's second-biggest producer of gas and third-largest producer of crude oil.

According to US Energy Information administration, oil and gas revenues account for over 50 per cent of Russia's budget revenues.

Government officials said the ambitious Iran-Pakistan-India ( IPI) pipeline could be revived after Western sanctions against the country is eased. The project was put on backburner in 2008 by the UPA government citing reasons such as project structure, delivery period of gas, pricing and pipeline security. "Iran is keen and India needs energy. The project can be revived," the official quoted earlier said.

The oil ministry is also working on oil supply diversity especially after political disturbances in Iraq, India's biggest crude oil supplier after Saudi Arabia. India committed to import about 19 million tonnes of crude oil from Iraq and is concerned about the situation in the region, another government official said.

India is planning to source crude oil from Canada after it has developed Venezuela as one of the major suppliers outside the Gulf countries.

"African oil producing countries are willing to export on long-term basis and Indian refiners are in talks with them," the official said.

"There has been turmoil in Syria, Iraq and other oil producing countries in the Middle East. We can't keep all eggs in one basket," the official said. India imports more than 80 per cent of crude oil it processes. Indian refiners processed over 222 million tonnes of crude oil 2013-14. India's domestic crude output that year was about 38 million tonnes.

Source: ET

China fuels new boom in natural gas

0 comments
If Chinese Prime Minister Li Keqiang's recent visit to Britain sent out any signals, one of the strongest might be that China wants more natural gas.

Among dozens of bilateral cooperation agreements ranging from energy and technology to infrastructure, British oil major BP PLC signed a deal worth around $20 billion to supply China National Offshore Oil Corp. with liquefied natural gas cargos, accounting for over two-thirds of total deals signed in June between the two national economies by value.

China's heightened interest in natural gas consumption -- a response to recent smog as well as longer-term worries about public health, social unrest and an undesired national image -- comes as the country's air pollution consistently makes headlines. Last year, only three out of 74 Chinese cities monitored met a stricter national air quality standard. And China's capital, Beijing, and financial center, Shanghai, experienced air pollution at hazardous levels.

Worsening air pollution, largely linked to burning coal, has been forcing the world's largest coal consumer, China, to seek cleaner alternatives. Since last year, Chinese officials announced a long list of supportive policies for consuming more natural gas.

"Natural gas is a quick fix for China's air pollution," said Lin Boqiang, director of the China Center for Energy Economics Research at Xiamen University. Lin added, "Wind and solar power make up only a tiny percentage of [the] Chinese energy mix, and it takes at least five years to build a nuclear reactor. So, compared to nuclear and renewables, natural gas is better positioned to quickly replace the use of coal."

According to government statistics, China's natural gas consumption increased from 107.5 billion cubic meters in 2010 to 169.2 billion cubic meters in 2013. Chinese policymakers expect this figure to continue growing, hitting 230 billion cubic meters next year and 400 billion cubic meters by 2020.

Rising reliance on foreign gas

But what has lagged behind is the country's ability to supply the needed natural gas. Although China raised its gas production by 28 percent over the last three years, the rising domestic outputs have helped narrow the gap between supply and demand -- but not close it.

With that in mind, China has sent vessels all over the globe to carry back liquefied natural gas to the country. It has also extended pipelines thousands of miles away to connect with gas-rich states such as Myanmar and Turkmenistan. More recently, Chinese President Xi Jinping shook the hand of his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, in Shanghai, for a $400 billion long-term agreement signed to pump natural gas from untapped fields in East Siberia to populous Chinese cities.

While those contracts help China catch up with its growing appetite for natural gas, it also poses a threat to the nation's energy security. A self-sufficient natural gas supplier as recently as 2006, China last year relied on imported gas to meet more than 30 percent of its demand.

To strengthen energy security, Chinese policymakers have been scrambling for ways to speed up domestic gas production, and part of that growth is expected to come from unconventional gas resources. In that regard, the country's energy giant Sinopec has ramped up exploration and drilling shale blocks in southwestern China, aiming to reach an annual production capacity of 5 billion cubic meters in 2015 and then doubling it two years later.

Climate benefits in doubt

Jane Nakano, a fellow of the Energy and National Security Program at Washington, D.C.-based think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies, said that the progress by Sinopec has strengthened the prospect for commercializing shale gas resources in China. The nation, however, still confronts various barriers such as high production costs and a lack of pipelines to transfer the produced gas, she said. Besides that, there is a danger that the solution designed to end one problem may spark another.

"Shale gas production is a water-intensive process," Nakano said. "China already faces the water scarcity problem. In the absence of proper regulation on its usage and disposal, water could become a significantly contentious issue that could not only stall the commercialization but also destabilize the society."

Water scarcity likely worsened by shale gas production is one of several environmental risks associated with China's fresh interest in natural gas, according to analysts. While the Chinese government believes that it will emit 520 million tons less carbon dioxide when meeting the national natural gas consumption goal in 2015, not everyone agrees.

That is because producing synthetic natural gas -- a resource China plans to tap into through coal gasification -- may do more harm than good in terms of climate change mitigation. According to a commentary published last year by Duke University researchers, synthetic natural gas has 36 to 82 percent more life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions than pulverized coal-fired power if the gas is used to generate electricity. If used to drive vehicles, it has emissions twice as large as those from gasoline vehicles (ClimateWire, March 12).

More challenges ahead

China's push for higher natural gas consumption also can generate other headaches. For one, massive construction work is involved with 44,000 kilometers of new gas pipelines, a distance equivalent to circling the Earth at least once.

That many kilometers will be needed by 2015 for delivering natural gas from energy producers to consumers. Moreover, a government-controlled pricing mechanism has already hit gas importers such as China National Petroleum Corp. with financial losses of 105.2 billion yuan ($16.9 billion) since 2011. Such losses are expected to soar as the country's demand for natural gas continues to grow.

Chinese policymakers have begun liberalizing domestic wholesale gas prices, but completing that economic reform could take years.

Statistics from the National Development and Reform Commission, China's top economic planning agency, show that natural gas accounted for 4.4 percent of China's energy mix in 2010, and this figure is set to climb to 7.5 percent by 2015. Yet it remains lower than the international average of 23.8 percent.

"Whether or not China will further increase the share of natural gas in its energy mix depends on how fast the government wants to solve air pollution," said Lin, the energy expert at Xiamen University.

"If the government plans to solve the pollution in 20 years, we are likely to use more nuclear and renewable energy rather than natural gas," Lin said. "But if the timeline for fighting air pollution is limited in five or 10 years, more natural gas supplies will be unquestionably in need, so are higher energy budgets and more pipeline construction."

Source: EENEWS

Natural Gas Really Is Better Than Coal

0 comments
When talking about climate change, not all fossil fuels are created equal. Burning natural gas, for instance, produces nearly half as much carbon dioxide per unit of energy compared with coal. Natural gas is thus considered by many to be a “bridge fuel” that can help nations lower carbon emissions while they transition more slowly from fossil fuels to renewable, carbon-neutral forms of energy. The recent boom in natural gas production in the United States, for instance, contributed to a 3.8 percent drop in carbon emissions in 2012.

But natural gas has a climate downside—it’s mostly composed of methane. “Methane is a potent greenhouse gas,” said energy researcher Adam Brandt of Stanford University. The gas is about 30 times better at holding in the atmosphere’s heat compared with carbon dioxide. So if enough methane leaks during production, natural gas’s slim advantage over other fuels could be wiped out.

A report published today in Science, however, concludes that the United States’ leaky natural gas production system currently isn’t leaking enough methane to make it worse fuel for the climate than coal.

The natural gas production system is not sealed tight. There are some areas where methane is allowed to leak intentionally for purposes of safety, but there’s also a lot of leaky valves and cracked pipes out there that can let the gas out. Quantifying all those leaks, though, has proven tricky.

The Environmental Protection Agency provides estimates of methane emitted in the United States. To calculate these estimates, someone has to go to a facility and take direct measurements from various equipment and devices. Those measurements are added up to get a total for the facility. And the facilities where the measurements are taken will serve as the basis for calculations of methane emissions for a type of source or a region.

These official estimates, however, probably underestimate total methane leaked because the devices that are sampled to provide those estimates aren't necessarily representative of all of the devices used by the natural gas industry to produce and move its product. In addition, sampling is expensive and limited. It also only takes place at locations where facilities let the EPA in—those facilities may be different from the average facility, leading to sampling bias.

Studies that have directly measured methane levels have gotten much different results. Atmospheric tests that have covered the entire United States come up with methane emissions that are about 50 percent higher than the EPA estimates, according the new paper in Science. Partly that’s because air sampling will pick up both anthropogenic methane and methane from natural sources, such as wetlands. But it’s also because the EPA’s methods are so inaccurate—natural sources only account for a fraction of the discrepancy.

The air sampling studies, though, have found some odd peaks in regional methane emissions, causing scientists to worry that there could be a lot more methane leaking from sites of natural gas production than thought. So Brandt and his colleagues began tallying up all the places where natural gas production could be leaking methane along with other sources of methane that could be mistaken for natural gas emissions.

The large natural gas leaks suggested in regional studies “are unlikely to be representative of the entire [natural gas] industry,” they write. If there were natural gas leaks of that magnitude across the natural gas industry, then methane levels in the atmosphere would be much higher that surveyed in the air sampling studies. “Most devices do not leak,” Brandt noted. Only about 1 to 2 percent of the devices used in natural gas production leak any methane, and large emitters—what the researchers nickname “superemitters”—are even rarer.

Brandt and his team then took a look at all the excess methane being released into the atmosphere. For their calculations, they assumed all that methane was coming from the natural gas industry. That’s unlikely, they note, but it makes for a good worst-case scenario. But even that level of methane wasn’t enough to make natural gas a bigger greenhouse gas contributor than coal, the researchers found. And switching from coal to natural gas for energy production does reduce the total greenhouse effect on a scale of 100 years, the standard scientists use in calculations like these.

“We believe the leakage rates are likely higher than official estimates, but they are unlikely to be high enough to disfavor shifting from coal to natural gas,” Brandt said.

Natural gas has also been promoted as a cleaner fuel than diesel, and it’s replaced that fuel in many trucks and buses on city streets. But the climate benefits of such a switch are not as clear as the switch from coal to natural gas.

Taking into account methane leaks from extraction all the way down the pipeline to the pump may actually make natural gas less climate friendly than diesel. But it’s probably not time to abandon the natural gas bus. “There’s all sorts of reasons we might want to [replace] diesel buses,” Brandt says. For example, burning natural gas results in less air pollution and less reliance on imported petroleum.

For natural gas to assert itself as a more environmentally friendly fuel, though, the industry is going to have to plug up its leaky system. Companies may find it worth their while to do so, and not simply for the climate benefits. Less leakage equals more profit, and plugging just a few of the biggest leaks could easily increase income, Brandt says. “If we can develop ways to quickly and cheaply find these sources, it’s going to be very profitable for companies.”

Source: SMITHSONIAN.COM 

Budget 2014 positive step for energy security, say experts

0 comments
The importance given to renewable energy and climate change adaptation in the union budget 2014-2015 has been welcomed by experts, but they feel the projects need to be executed in a proper manner. Sectors like agriculture, the backbone of the masses' economy in village, will receive an impetus as these areas experience the ravages of climate change first hand, they said. 

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley Thursday announced the establishment of a 'National Adaptation Fund' for climate change. As an initial sum, an amount of Rs.100 crore will be transferred to the fund. "Climate changes is a reality which all of us have to face together. Agriculture as an activity is most prone to the vagaries of climate change," he said in the budget speech. 

The experts said it was necessary for the government to implement the projects in a proper manner manner. 

"We will have to wait and watch...how the plans are laid out and how beneficial will these turn out for the common man," Mili Majumdar, director, sustainable habitats at Association for Development and Research of Sustainable Habitats, The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), told IANS. 

Moreover, thrust should be given on developing indigenous green technologies. 

"There are two things to be considered... are you putting the money in developing technologies or in procuring technologies...It would be a lot cheaper to engineer our own technology," Mainak Das, assistant professor, department of biological sciences and bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, told IANS. 

Lauding the move as "fantastic", Joyashree Roy, initiator and co-ordinator, Global Change Programme at the Jadavpur University here, said developmental projects with respect to climate change mitigation will receive a boost which is much needed as "India is a highly impacted country". 

"This means climate change adaptation will become sustainable. It's a step forward... as the agriculture sector is one of the sectors that is immensely affected," Roy told IANS. This would ensure growth and development go hand in hand with environmental protection and climate change measures, Roy said. 

Echoing Roy, solar energy expert S.P. Gonchaudhury, who is also the advisor to the West Bengal state government's power department, pointed out that as many as 0.4 billion people in India do not have access to energy. 

Factoring in this gap, he said the stress on renewables was much appreciated. 

In addition, Gonchaudhury said globally it was a signal that India was "committed to reducing" carbon emissions. "Not only the UK, I think other countries like the US would be keen to invest in India on renewables," he said. 

For the renewable and clean energy sectors, Jaitley proposed to take up Ultra Mega Solar Power Projects in Rajasthan, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu and Laddakh in Jammu and Kashmir. A sum of Rs.500 crore was allocated for this purpose. 

He also allocated a sum of Rs.400 crore for launching a scheme for solar power driven agricultural pump sets and water pumping stations. An additional amount of Rs.100 core has been earmarked for the development of 1 MW solar parks on the banks of canals. 

Jaitley said implementation of Green Energy Corridor Projects will be accelerated in this financial year to facilitate evacuation of renewable energy across the country. "The decision is welcome...it shows that we are moving forward keeping all concerns in mind," Majumdar said.

Source: ET

Investment worth $10 bn hanging on gas price clarity: GE

0 comments
General Electric vice-chairman John Rice would like to see more discussion on modernising freight rail system. He says a lot of investment would be needed to modernize it.  On its deal with Alstom, Rice says it would be good for India. However, he is yet to decide on Alstom's India future - whether it will continue to stay listed in India or not.

He believes the new government must look at encouraging ease of doing business and reduce regulatory burden. He feels the Modi government will push through reforms. According to him, there is a need for clarity on gas prices as investments worth USD 10 billion are tied up by companies. He says: “It would be terrific if clarity on gas prices comes in 90 days.” GE wants to make large investments in India’s gas market. But the investment would be less if gas price is significantly lower than market price, he adds. GE is also looking to expand its healthcare business. Rice says GE is always on the lookout for potential acquisitions. It also plans to look at Indian JVs in power generation, oil and gas and healthcare sectors. Below is the verbatim transcript of John Rice's interview with CNBC-TV18 

Q: It is a very different India since the time we last had you on CNBC-TV18. We have a new government in place and this government is making all the right noises when it comes to taking the reform agenda forward. How confident are you feeling about the India story as a long time India investor? 

A: We are encouraged and confident. The Prime Minister's track record doesn’t need to be explained by me. The people that he has assembled around him are can do people and so we are very optimistic about the prospects for India. They are talking about investment, they are talking about infrastructure and those are things that we talk about. 

Q: Speaking of GEs interest in India and as I pointed out GE has been a long time investor in India. You have stayed with the Indian economy through good times and bad but in the context of specific announcements that have come in from the government already – it’s barely six weeks old but let me ask you about the Railway Budget in specific which was unveiled on Tuesday. The government has talked about foreign direct investment in railway infrastructure, has talked about promoting public private partnership which hasn’t really taken off in the railways. How confident are you feeling about the railway story in India which is something that I know GE has been betting on for a very long time? 

A: We would like to see in the Budget a little more discussion about modernising the existing freight rail system. We think that is also important in addition to new technologies like high speed rail. Those are relevant and important but they touch a smaller segment of the population. So, we would look for a little broader role for investment in rail that would include the traditional freight rail system which needs to be modernised and needs to be upgraded where we think we can play a role. 

Q: Are you enthused because you talked about freight and yesterday the railway minister said that this government’s target is to make India the largest freight carrier in the world. Does that enthuse you and if they were to lay out the specifics what kind of investments could we potentially be talking about?

A: Certainly several hundred million dollars. If you look at what it will take to fully modernise the freight rail system and do what the minister suggested which we think is important, at the end of the day freight has an enormous role to play and the movement of freight in India's economy and we think that is just going to grow in the years ahead. So, we support those comments and we think that there needs to be a form of investment and public private partnership around that. We are prepared to work with the government in that capacity and we would like to start tomorrow. 

Q: The government has talked about inviting FDI, of course the matter is pending cabinet approval, not in railway operations but in railway infrastructure. The government also has big plans for bullet trains and a high speed railway network, so on and so forth, do you believe that foreign investors are going to be takers for this story? 

A: I do. We have in the past over the last 10 years, we have demonstrated several times our willingness to be an investor in the rail modernisation programme here. For different reasons the projects did not move forward. We think the time is right, we think this is the government. We appreciate and support what the rail minister is saying and we want to be part of the process and we are prepared to be one of those investors. 

Q: GE’s global deal with Alstom will also result in ownership change of Alstom India and Alstom T&D, what is this going to now mean for GE’s infrastructure story and infrastructure play in India with ownership change of both these Alstom companies? 

A: We are still in the process of working through the details and it will take us six to nine months to be able to close this and get all the regulatory approvals and do everything we need to do to actually complete the deal but we are very optimistic. Alstom brings a very established presence in India, about 8000 employees, I think when we are done we will have over 20,000 employees in India, significant expansion of our manufacturing base here, some important joint ventures with important Indian companies. So, for us in India the combination of GE and Alstom gives us an even better foundation to work from. 

Q: Share with us what you can specifically for the kind of opportunity that Alstom will give GE in power infrastructure, the power transmission space specifically. How confident are you feeling about that given the fact that this government is talking about power sector reforms and also big renewable energy push? 

A: The government is talking about the need for reforms and we think this government will push through and make that happen. The awesome capabilities married with GE capabilities which we believe are very complementary give us a much better framework with which to support and push forward these reforms. So, in the context of what we do as a company and what the country needs and what the government wants private investors to do we think this is 1+1=3 combination. 

Q: I don’t know if you can share details with us or you have specifics worked out just yet but both listed entities in India, would you like to remain listed, would you like to take the delisting route once the transaction is complete? 

A: We are still working through those details and over the coming months as the process for putting this transaction together takes place we will be able to talk in more detail about exactly what will happen and how it will happen. 

Q: One of the reforms that seem to have gotten delayed even further is the reform related to aligning gas prices to market rates. The Rangarajan formula we talked about the last time, you were hopeful that the government would implement the new price regime for gas prices - that hasn’t happened. It is likely to be at least another three months wait. Bob Dudley of BP has called the experience in India on gas pricing disappointing to say the least. How would you assess the current situation and do you believe that this has been a disappointment? 

A: It is certainly important for this to be resolved. Depending on how you keep score there are tens of billions of dollars of investments that are tied up in this part of reform. The wait for clarity, BP is going to make big investments, Indian companies are going to make big investments, companies like GE will participate in our way and the government is talking about the need for foreign investment and talking about the need for infrastructure and this fits hand in glove with those needs. So, clarity and decision around gas pricing has never been more important. If it comes out in the next 90 days that would be terrific but it is very important that we get some resolution which gives investors the clarity they need to move forward with these important projects.

Source: Moneycontrol

Natural gas allocation policy to be rejigged

0 comments
In a major revamp of natural gas allocation policy, the government will give city gas projects, selling CNG to automobiles and piped cooking gas to households, top-most priority for receipt of domestically-produced gas.

Presently, urea-manufacturing fertiliser plants have the first right over the domestically produced gas, followed by liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) plants and power stations. City gas distribution (CGD) projects are ranked fourth currently.

This priority listing is now being changed to give CGD firms like Indraprastha Gas (IGL), which sells CNG to automobiles and piped gas to households in national capital, top priority, official sources said.
CGD firms like IGL currently get 8.32 million standard cubic meters per day of gas out of total domestic supplies of about 77 mmscmd.

As city gas projects get rolled out in newer cities, the requirement of the sector will grow and so the government is now giving it top priority. Sources said compressed natural gas (CNG) and piped natural gas (PNG) are clean fuels and will help replace subsidised diesel in automobiles and LPG in households respectively.

According to the new allocation policy being finalised, additional requirement for CGD will be first met by imposing proportionate cuts in the domestic gas presently being supplied to sectors other than priority sectors as decided by the oil ministry. 

Plants providing inputs to stretegic sectors of atomic energy and space research will get the second priority, followed by plants that can extract higher fractions from natural gas. Gas-based urea plants will rank fourth in the priority list and power stations fifth. Since domestic gas production is now stagnant, it is being proposed to freeze allocation to all sectors expect CND and LPG sector, at supply levels of 2013-14.

In 2013-14, fertiliser plants received 29.79 mmscmd of gas. Power plants got 25.59 mmscmd while LPG
extraction plants received 1.83 mmscmd. Petrochemical plants received 3.32 mmscmd while refineries got 1.89 mmscmd and steel plants 1.32 mmscmd.

Sources said incremental production from NELP blocks like KG-D6 and Gujarat State Petroleum Corp's (GSPC) Deendayal gas will be allocated as per the decision taken in the meeting of an Empowered Group of
Ministers (EGoM) on August 23, 2013. The EGoM had decided that incremental gas would go to power plants. Sources said that in the current gas utilisation policy there are ambiguities. 

Source: FE

MEA seeks to help oil ministry secure India’s energy interests

0 comments
Taking the Narendra Modi-led government’s theme of using diplomacy to secure economic interests forward, foreign minister Sushma Swaraj has asked the oil ministry to prepare a list of areas and countries where her ministry can pitch in to contribute towards India’s energy security, said Dharmendra Pradhan, India’s petroleum minister, in an interview on Thursday. “The foreign minister has asked me for a list of areas and countries where her ministry can help us. It’s not that it has not happened before but now it is happening aggressively,” Pradhan said.

This comes at a time when India’s energy security future remains clouded by sputtering investments in power, hydrocarbons and coal mining at home and troubled forays abroad, even as the new government, which rode to power on a promise of prosperity and economic revival, settles down. Given the foreign policy imperatives for India’s energy security, the petroleum minister has also appointed an Indian Foreign Service officer as his personal assistant. “This government has started thinking in that direction (forming an energy security doctrine). When we know that there is limitation to its speed and scale, despite that the prime minister clubbed the ministries for a presentation, which all ministries were called to—oil and gas, power, coal and non-renewable energy.

This is a first indication that let’s have a big canvas so that there could be a joint strategy for energy requirements,” said Pradhan. While the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had articulated the need for energy security in its election manifesto, India, which is highly dependent on imports to meet its energy demand, is yet to evolve a “long-term national energy security policy”. India, the world’s fourth-largest energy-consuming nation after the US, China and Russia, accounts for 4.4% of global energy consumption. India imports 80% of its crude oil and 25% of its natural gas requirements.

The country’s energy demand is expected to more than double by 2035, from less than 700 million tonnes of oil equivalent (mtoe) now to around 1,500mtoe, according to India’s oil ministry. “Our prime minister has given an important policy statement about what should our foreign departments do. He said that foreign departments should protect India’s economic interests,” Pradhan said. Progress with fuel pipelines—once seen as the one-stop solution for energy woes—has been dismal. Some attempts to achieve energy security through overseas investments have run into trouble such as ONGC Videsh Ltd’s (OVL’s) $2.1 billion acquisition of Imperial Energy Corp. Plc’s Siberian deposits. OVL, which is tasked with securing energy resources overseas, has also faced difficulties in Venezuela, South Sudan and Syria. Till now, the company has invested Rs.78,000 crore in overseas energy assets. Also, the security situation in Iraq, a key supplier of crude oil to Asia’s third-largest economy, has been a cause of concern. India imports 12.9% of its requirements, or 21-22 million tonnes, from Iraq.

As a supplier, the country has displaced Iran, targeted by Western sanctions because of its suspected nuclear weapons programme. However, Pradhan dismissed such concerns. In response to a question about India arranging for alternate supply, Pradhan said, “I said that when there is a crisis in Iraq that I will do that. But there is no crisis in Iraq. Whatever our offtake from Iraq is, we have done that. Around 40-45% has already been completed. India’s procurement linkages are far-off from the areas in Iraq where there is a crisis. Our procurement is safe. We are still getting oil.” “We have started receiving good news. Oil has stabilized.

These are good signs. Had there been no such crisis in Iraq, we would have got even more consumer-friendly rate to India. Iraq forced us into some problems but despite that we have managed to do this.” Pradhan also wants the public sector undertakings (PSUs) under his ministry to change their style of functioning, and open up positions to private sector experts. “PSUs are important organs of this oil economy. They need to change with time, especially their top leadership. A lot of new talent join them, especially from engineering and marketing, therefore, there is no shortage of intellectual capacity there. What it needs is a leadership who can have a world view, who can get best technology, best marketing practices of the world and have a knack of social profiting.

Therefore, we need to strengthen its leadership with dynamism and accountability,” Pradhan said. On its part, the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance has expressed its willingness to open up these positions to private sector experts for providing effective governance, with the desired priority skills being set as “high integrity” and “high efficiency”. “Even within the country, there are a lot of models where we have world-class competency. So, we need to pull together all the best practices. PSU leadership will have to update themselves. They have to be more focused and dynamic if they have to compete with the world giants,” Pradhan said. “When I said that this government is going towards a paradigm shift for governance, this, (opening PSU leadership positions to the private sector) is also a part of that. If we need to make this country a world economic power, we will have to do whatever is required.”

Source: LiveMint

Budget 2014: Should Rationalise Tax for Oil and Gas Sector

0 comments
During the last decade, India's oil and gas imports have been rising due to increased oil and gas consumption. The domestic production has been unable to keep pace with the rising demand. Given this, apart from various policy measures, the government can initiate fiscal measures to boost the investment in oil and gas sector and secure economic growth.

From E&P (exploration and production) companies' perspective, several issues on the tax holiday for production of mineral oils need resolution. Firstly, tax authorities have been denying this benefit on natural gas on the basis that natural gas does not fall within ambit of the term 'mineral oils'. They also argue that a specific reference has been made where the legislature intended to provide tax holiday benefit (such as for blocks awarded under NELP VIII). Considering that production of natural gas is adjunct to production of petroleum, there ought to be parity in the tax treatment of natural gas and petroleum.

Secondly, tax holiday provision was retrospectively amended from 1999-2000 to specify that all blocks licensed under a single contract shall be considered as a single undertaking. Given the very nature of this business, wells within the same block commence production on staggered basis. This amendment effectively results in denial of tax holiday benefit to wells that commence production later and thus, lesser benefit to E&P companies. Well-wise or field-wise tax holiday claim should be allowed.

Thirdly, due to high exploration costs, E&P companies are unable to benefit from the tax holiday as they make miniscule profits/losses in the first few years. It is recommended that the period for claiming tax holiday be aligned with the infrastructure sector i.e., amend the current 7 years from year of commercial production to 10 out of 15 years from year of commercial production.

Presently, deduction for unsuccessful exploration expenses is allowed only in respect of a surrendered area. Such requirement of surrendering the area for availing deduction for abortive expenditure induce E&P companies to surrender the area without fully exploring the same, which is not in interest of the industry and the country. Therefore, the Government should withdraw this condition.

Presumptive taxation regime is available to foreign oilfield services providers whereby 10 per cent of gross revenue is deemed to be profit. In 2010, an amendment was introduced carving out technical services from presumptive taxation and subjecting them to net basis taxation. This has significantly increased compliance cost, upended well settled positions and led to rise in litigation. The government ought to withdraw this amendment as this translates into reduced interest from reputed service providers to work in India.

In the mid-stream and downstream sector, investment-linked incentive of 100 per cent deduction of pre-commencement capital expenditure is allowed for laying and operating a cross country natural gas or crude or petroleum oil pipeline network for distribution, including storage facilities. This incentive ought to be extended to dedicated pipelines and intra-city and intra-state gas distribution networks as this will help develop infrastructure required for supporting economic growth.

Further, 10 year profit-linked incentive available to infrastructure facility should be extended to LNG terminals in view of huge expenditure incurred to set up and operate the terminals.

On the indirect tax front, natural gas is not a 'declared' good, unlike coal and crude oil and hence, natural gas is subject to VAT rate of up to 20 per cent, instead of a cap of 4 per cent applicable to declared goods. Declared goods status should be extended to natural gas in order to optimize VAT liability.

Considering the huge capital investment and uncertainty involved in the exploration activity, service tax leviable on exploration activities should be withdrawn

Source:  E&Y

Natural Gas As A Pillar Of Growth

0 comments















Source: ceew.in/

India Energy Profile(Analysis): Economic Growth Fuels Increased Need for Energy

0 comments
India was the fourth-largest energy consumer in the world after China, the United States, and Russia in 2011, and its need for energy supply continues to climb as a result of the country’s dynamic economic growth and modernization over the past several years. India’s economy has grown at an average annual rate of approximately 7% since 2000, and it proved relatively resilient following the 2008 global financial crisis.

The latest slowdown in growth of emerging market countries and higher inflation levels, combined with domestic supply and infrastructure constraints, have reduced India’s annual inflation-adjusted gross domestic product (GDP) growth from a high of 10.3% in 2010 to 4.4% in 2013, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). India was the third-largest economy in the world in 2013, as measured on a purchasing power parity basis. Risks to economic growth in India include high debt levels, infrastructure deficiencies, delays in structural reforms, and political polarization between the country’s two largest political parties, the Indian National Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

The BJP, elected as the majority party in May 2014 to govern India in the following five years, faces challenges to meet the country’s growing energy demand by securing affordable energy supplies and attracting investment for infrastructure development. Highly regulated fuel prices for consumers, fuel subsidies that are shouldered by the government and state-owned upstream companies, and inconsistent energy sector reform currently hinder energy project investment. Some parts of the energy sector, chiefly coal production, remain relatively closed to private and foreign investment, while others such as electric power, petroleum and other liquids, and natural gas have regulated price structures that discourage private investment.

Despite having large coal reserves and a healthy growth in natural gas production over the past two decades, India is increasingly dependent on imported fossil fuels. In 2013, India’s former petroleum and natural gas minister, Veerappa Moily, announced that his ministry would work on an action plan to make India energy independent by 2030 through increased fossil fuel production, development of resources such as coalbed methane and shale gas, foreign acquisitions by domestic Indian companies of upstream hydrocarbon reserves, reduced subsidies on motor fuels, and oil and natural gas pricing reforms. The current petroleum and natural gas minister, Dharmendra Pradhan, who took office in late May 2014, reiterated the goal of making India self-sufficient in energy resources. India is also looking to further develop and harness its various renewable energy sources. These actions would effectively increase India’s energy supply and create more efficiency in energy consumption. India already began implementing oil and gas pricing reforms over the past two years to foster sustainable investment and help lower subsidy costs.

Primary energy consumption in India has more than doubled between 1990 and 2012, reaching an estimated 32 quadrillion British thermal units (Btu). The country has the second-largest population in the world, at more than 1.2 billion people in 2012, growing about 1.3% each year since 2008, according to World Bank data. At the same time, India’s per capita energy consumption is one-third of the global average, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA), indicating potentially higher energy demand in the long term as the country continues its path of economic development. In the International Energy Outlook 2013, EIA projects India and China will account for about half of global energy demand growth through 2040, with India’s energy demand growing at 2.8% per year.

India’s largest energy source is coal, followed by petroleum and traditional biomass and waste. Since the beginning of the New Economic Policy in 1991, India’s population increasingly has moved to cities, and urban households have shifted away from traditional biomass and waste to other energy sources such as hydrocarbons, nuclear, biofuels, and other renewables. The power sector is the largest and fastest-growing area of energy demand, rising from 22% to 36% of total energy consumption between 1990 and 2011, according to the IEA. India’s National Sample Survey Organization estimates that about 25% of the population (over 300 million people) lack basic access to electricity, while electrified areas suffer from rolling electricity blackouts. The government seeks to balance the country’s growing need for electricity with environmental concerns from the use of coal and other energy sources to produce that electricity. India’s transportation sector, primarily fueled by petroleum products, is set to expand as the country focuses on improving road and railway transit. The government plans to mandate some alternative fuel use, particularly with biofuel blends, and develop greater use of mass transit systems to limit oil demand growth.

Petroleum and other liquids

India was the fourth-largest consumer of crude oil and petroleum products in the world in 2013, after the United States, China, and Japan. The country depends heavily on imported crude oil, mostly from the Middle East.

India was the fourth-largest consumer of oil and petroleum products after the United States, China, and Japan in 2013, and it was also the fourth-largest net importer of crude oil and petroleum products. The gap between India’s oil demand and supply is widening, as demand reached nearly 3.7 million barrels per day (bbl/d) in 2013 compared to less than 1 million bbl/d of total liquids production. EIA projects India’s demand will more than double to 8.2 million bbl/d by 2040, while domestic production will remain relatively flat, hovering around 1 million bbl/d. The high degree of dependence on imported crude oil has led Indian energy companies to diversify their supply sources. To this end, Indian national oil companies (NOCs) have purchased equity stakes in overseas oil and gas fields in South America, Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Caspian Sea region to acquire reserves and production capability. However, the majority of imports continue to come from the Middle East, where Indian companies have little direct access to investment.

Sector organization

India’s upstream petroleum liquids industry is still mainly owned by state-owned firms, although the sector is open for competition and attracts some level of private and foreign investment. The government regulates the fuel price for petroleum products, although the mounting costs of fuel subsidies in recent years have encouraged the government to lift retail price caps on some oil products.

Almost two decades after nationalizing the country’s hydrocarbon resources in the 1970s, the Indian government embarked on the New Economic Policy in 1991 that pushed for open market competition across a variety of energy sectors. The government introduced the New Exploration Licensing Policy (NELP) in 1999 that allowed investors to bid on development blocks with up to 100% foreign control. Currently, the government is preparing to issue the 10th round of bidding for the NELP after more than two years of awarding contracts for the 9th round of the NELP. The 9th round resulted in 13 contracts signed (1 for each block awarded) out of 34 blocks that were offered.

International investment is still relatively low, and most analysts agree that the NELP has had only limited success in reducing India’s oil dependence. India is offering 46 exploration blocks under the new NELP round, including 17 onshore, 15 shallow-water, and 14 deepwater blocks. The round was scheduled to officially open in February 2014, although the government is in the process of determining the structure of petroleum contracts between the government and companies. The current system includes a production-sharing mechanism allowing producers to recover exploration costs during production before sharing profits with the government.

The Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas (MOPNG) regulates the entire value chain of the oil sector, including exploration and production (E&P), refining, supply, and marketing. The ministry releases five-year plans that serve as rough guidelines to the energy sector. Under the MOPNG, the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons regulates the upstream side of the oil sector, as well as coalbed methane (CBM) projects. Another sub-ministry, the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board (PNGRB), acts as a downstream regulator, including petroleum product sales and distribution.

Until 2002, the government set the price of petroleum products through the Administered Pricing Mechanism (APM), which followed the principle of allowing a predetermined return (rather than market-based prices) on investments in the oil sector. After 2002, only certain products (namely kerosene and liquefied petroleum gases, or LPG, often used for cooking or home heating) remained regulated, while oil companies could set their own prices for other fuels. However, many oil marketing companies still set retail prices at below-market levels so they could claim under-recoveries (the difference between a global market price and the local price) from the Ministry of Finance for certain products at favorable rates. The government began domestic fuel price reform and officially deregulated gasoline prices in June 2010 (to take effect in 2012). High international oil prices in recent years and growing demand for oil products have increased the country’s fiscal deficit as a result of its mounting fuel subsidy bill. In January 2013, India began a phased deregulation of retail diesel prices each month to reduce some of the country’s subsidies.

Competition in the oil sector is now relatively open, particularly when it comes to the upstream market. On one hand, two state-owned companies, the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) and Oil India Limited (OIL), control the majority of production and refining activity in India. ONGC is India’s largest oil producer, accounting for about 69% of the domestic production in 2012 according to the company’s annual report. On the other hand, the government has slowly reduced its share of ownership in ONGC in an effort to raise revenue, and several private companies have emerged as important players in the past decade. Cairn India, a subsidiary of British company Cairn Energy, controls more than 20% of India’s crude oil production through its operation of major stakes in the Rajasthan and Gujarat regions and the Krishna-Godavari basin. Private companies like Reliance Industries (RIL) and Essar Oil have become major refiners. Other international oil companies have few stakes in the Indian oil market.

Exploration and production

India held nearly 5.7 billion barrels of proved oil reserves at the beginning of 2014, mostly in the western part of the country. Domestic production has not kept pace with demand in recent years, leading to exploration of deepwater and marginal fields and investment in improving recovery rates of existing fields. In addition, Indian national oil companies are purchasing more upstream stakes in overseas oil fields to increase supply security from imported crude oil.

According to the Oil & Gas Journal (OGJ), India held nearly 5.7 billion barrels of proved oil reserves at the beginning of 2014. About 44% of reserves are onshore resources, while 56% are offshore. Most reserves are found in the western part of India, particularly the Western offshore area near Gujarat and Rajasthan. The Assam-Arakan basin in the northeastern part of the country is also an important oil-producing region and contains more than 23% of the country’s reserves and 12% of the production.

Historically, ONGC dominated the upstream oil sector and relied on production from Mumbai High basin and its associated fields in the western offshore area. India’s total petroleum and other liquids production increase has been very gradual during the past two decades, growing at less than 2% total and peaking at 996,000 bbl/d in 2011. Production has declined slightly to 982,000 bbl/d in 2013. The Mumbai High, Gujarat, and Assam-Arakan basins contain mature fields experiencing production declines, although several redevelopment projects, enhanced oil recovery efforts, and marginal field development projects in these basins are underway to lift production by 2030.

Indian and foreign companies are investing in more frontier developments and marginal fields to help offset production declines from mature basins. In recent years, major discoveries in the Barmer basin in Rajasthan and the offshore Krishna-Godavari basin by smaller companies such as Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation and Andhra Pradesh Gas Infrastructure Corporation hold some potential to diversify the country’s production.

India’s relatively small land-based resource endowment means companies require more upstream technical expertise to tap into offshore reserves, especially in technically challenging deepwater reserves. Foreign companies historically took the lead in exploring new offshore opportunities. For example, Cairn India brought online the largest field, Mangala, of the RJ-ON-90/1 block in Barmer basin in 2009, with a production capacity of 130,000 bbl/d. The Rajasthan fields, including Mangala, produced 179,000 bbl/d in 2013, according to FACTS Global Energy (FGE), and Cairn India reports production from the fields could peak at 300,000 bbl/d. Despite Cairn’s successful drilling in Rajasthan, foreign investment in India has waned in recent years, both because of increased competition from domestic Indian companies and India’s complex exploration and production laws.

The government has encouraged companies to acquire overseas upstream assets as a way to shield the domestic energy sector from global price volatility. Indian companies hold large stakes in Sudan’s GNOP block, Russia’s Sakhalin-1 project, and Venezuela’s San Cristobal and Carabobo blocks. Amerada Hess Corporation sold key oil fields in Azerbaijan to ONGC in 2012. Also, ONGC, OIL, and RIL have taken stakes in gas plays in Mozambique, shale gas assets in the United States and Canada, and oil and gas assets in Myanmar, and the companies are actively pursuing other overseas upstream deals. In 2011, several government agencies agreed to establish a sovereign wealth fund that could also aid in financing overseas energy acquisitions.

Downstream and refining

India’s government promotes the country’s refining sector, and India became a net exporter of petroleum products in 2001. India has several world-class refineries, and the private sector has significant investments in the country’s refining industry.

India’s government started encouraging energy companies to invest in refineries at the end of the 1990s, and the investment helped the country become a net exporter of petroleum products in 2001. In particular, the government eliminated customs duties on crude imports, lowering the cost of fuel supply for refiners. These reforms made domestic production of petroleum products more economic for Indian companies. In its 11th Five Year Plan (2007-2012), India’s government set the goal of making India a global exporting hub of refined products.

However, India still imports kerosene and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) products for domestic use, and some export-oriented refineries began reorienting production for domestic use in 2009 to help ease shortages of motor gasoline, gasoil, kerosene, and LPG. These products make up 73% of India’s petroleum product consumption, according to FGE. In particular, many rural areas of India use LPG and kerosene along with traditional biomass as cooking fuels (see Biomass and Waste below). The government is encouraging a shift from kerosene used in cooking fuel in rural areas to LPG, a cleaner and less-expensive fuel. Liquid fuels have competed with natural gas in the past few years as the power and fertilizer industries are using natural gas as a substitute for some naphtha and fuel oil supply. Diesel remains the most-consumed oil product, accounting for 42% of petroleum product consumption in 2013.

The refining industry is an important part of India’s economy, and the private sector owns about 38% of total capacity. At the end of 2013, India had 4.35 million bbl/d of refining capacity, making it the second-largest refiner in Asia after China, according to FGE. The two largest refineries by crude capacity, located in the Jamnagar complex in Gujarat, are world-class export facilities and are owned by Reliance Industries. The Jamnagar refineries account for 29% of India’s current capacity. These refineries are close to crude oil-producing regions in the Middle East, which allows them to take advantage of lower transportation costs.

India projects an increase of the country’s refining capacity to 6.3 million bbl/d by 2017 based on its current five-year plan to meet rising domestic demand and export markets, although this projection hinges on all proposed projects becoming operational. Some refinery projects have faced delays in the past few years, and there is now greater competition within Asia from countries such as China that has built large refineries able to process more complex crude oil types. Two refineries, Paradip in Odisha and Cuddalore in the southern state of Tamil Nadu, are scheduled to be operational by 2015, adding 420,000 bbl/d of capacity. Also, refiners have plans to upgrade several existing refineries to produce higher-quality auto fuels to comply with more stringent specifications for vehicle fuel standards. India plans to adopt the equivalent of Euro IV fuel efficiency standards on a nationwide basis by 2015 and Euro V standards on passenger cars by 2016. Refineries have proposed several expansions to existing facilities and a few new refineries by 2020, although the timeline of these projects depends on economic recovery and fuel sales in both domestic and export markets.

Trade

India is a significant importer of crude oil, as the country’s demand growth continues to outstrip domestic supply growth. The Middle East was the major source of crude oil imports to India in 2013, although the Western Hemisphere’s share has risen in recent years.

India has increased its total net oil imports from 42% of demand in 1990 to an estimated 71% of demand in 2012. India’s demand for crude oil and petroleum products is projected to continue rising, barring a serious global economic recession. Oil import dependence will continue to climb if India fails to achieve production growth equal to demand growth.

The Indian Ocean historically has been a major transit route, bringing crude oil from suppliers in the Persian Gulf and Africa to markets in Asia. Tanker sea lanes pass near Indian waters between major chokepoints such as the Strait of Malacca and the Strait of Hormuz (see the World Oil Transit Chokepoints report). The majority of Indian oil ports are located on the country’s western side to receive shipments of crude oil that passes through these routes.

India’s crude oil imports reached nearly 3.9 million bbl/d in 2013, according to Global Trade Atlas. Saudi Arabia is India’s largest oil supplier, with a 20% share of crude oil imports. In total, approximately 62% of India’s imported crude oil came from Middle East countries. The second-biggest source of imports is the Western Hemisphere (19%), with the majority of that crude oil coming from Venezuela. Africa contributed 16% of India’s crude oil imports. Supply disruptions in several countries, including Iran, Libya, Sudan, and Nigeria, in tandem with India’s growing dependence on imported crude oil, have compelled India to diversify its crude oil import slate. Iran accounted for 5.5% of India’s crude imports in 2013, down from 8.3% in 2011-12 as a result of the U.S. and European sanctions imposed on Iranian oil exports. Also, Indian refiners are trying to reduce crude oil import costs by purchasing less expensive crude oil. Prices of Middle Eastern crude oil grades in the past year have been high relative to prices of oil from the Western Hemisphere, prompting Indian companies to import more crude oil from Latin America, primarily from Venezuela, Colombia, and Mexico.

Despite being a net importer of crude oil, India has become a net exporter of petroleum products by investing in refineries designed for export, particularly in Gujarat. Essar Oil and RIL export naphtha, motor gasoline, and gasoil to the international market, particularly to Singapore, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and the Netherlands. Reliance Industries has also targeted U.S. markets and leased storage space in New York harbor in 2008. However, the government encourages the companies to focus on supplying domestic markets before selling abroad.

Pipelines and infrastructure

According to the Ministry of Oil and Natural Gas, India’s crude oil pipeline network spans just under 5,900 miles and has a total capacity of 2.8 million bbl/d. Approximately 30 terminals, mostly on the northwest coast, take in crude oil imports. Pipelines run from these ports and producing areas (particularly from Gujarat) to major oil refineries in Gujarat, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, and Haryana. On the eastern part of the country, pipelines run from West Bengal to the Paradip oil refinery. Refineries are generally located in coastal areas, because the majority of crude oil comes from tanker imports and offshore fields. Central and southern areas have few major pipelines, because the bulk of refining capacity is in the northwest and northeast.

The Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) controls and operates the oil product pipelines and supplies most of the oil products going to the domestic market. Oil product pipelines cluster in the north and northeast parts of India, while central and southern areas must rely on oil distributed through other means, such as cargo trucks. IOC plans to build additional crude oil and product lines including one to move supplies from its Paradip refinery in the eastern Odisha state to growing demand centers in Odisha and adjacent states of Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh.

Strategic petroleum reserve

In 2005, the Indian Government decided to set up strategic storage of 37 million barrels of crude oil at three locations (Visakhapatnam, Mangalore, and Padur). The Indian Strategic Petroleum Reserves Limited (ISPRL), a special purpose legal entity owned by the Oil Industry Development Board, would manage the proposed facilities, which are expected to be completed by 2015. The government unveiled plans to add another 91 million barrels to the state’s crude oil capacity to protect India from supply disruptions by 2017. The country anticipates having crude oil stocks to cover 90 days of the country’s oil demand by 2020.

Natural gas

Natural gas serves as a substitute for coal in electricity generation and fertilizer production in India. The country began importing liquefied natural gas from Qatar in 2004 and increasingly relies on imports to meet domestic natural gas needs.

Natural gas mainly serves as a substitute for coal for electricity generation and as an alternative for LPG and other petroleum products in the fertilizer and other sectors. The country was self-sufficient in natural gas until 2004, when it began to import liquefied natural gas (LNG) from Qatar. Because it has not been able to create sufficient natural gas infrastructure on a national level or produce adequate domestic natural gas to meet domestic demand, India increasingly relies on imported LNG. India was the world’s fourth-largest LNG importer in 2013, following Japan, South Korea, and China, and consumed almost 6% of the global market, according to data from IHS Energy. Indian companies hold both long-term supply contracts and more expensive spot LNG contracts.

Natural gas consumption has grown at an annual rate of 8% from 2000 and 2012, although supply disruptions starting in 2011 resulted in declining consumption. Natural gas consumption in India was tied closely to domestic production until imports became available in 2004. In 2012, India consumed 2.1 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of natural gas. LNG imports accounted for about 29% of 2012 demand, and LNG is expected to account for an increasing portion of demand at least in the next several years as Indian energy firms attempt to reverse the country’s recent domestic production declines. Increasing LNG imports will depend on the pace of expansion in regasification terminal capacity and pipeline infrastructure connecting gas to markets that currently lack access. The country’s pricing system is undergoing revision to unlock regulated prices that are well below the import price levels. Raising gas prices would provide oil and gas firms with economic incentives for upstream development, especially in deepwater plays and technically challenging fields, and would allow LNG importers to compete more effectively for gas consumers in a higher-priced environment.

The majority of natural gas demand in 2012 came from the power sector (33%), the fertilizer industry (28%), and the replacement of LPG for cooking oil and other uses in the residential sector (15%), according to India’s MOPNG. The government has labeled these as priority sectors for domestic programs, which ensures that they receive larger shares of any new gas supply before other consumers. The fertilizer sector, which is highly price-sensitive, has been able to maintain low fuel costs by using natural gas. The recent unexpected natural gas production declines since 2011 have forced electric generators to seek fuel alternatives, primarily coal. The government is promoting the use of natural gas in the residential sector as an alternative to LPG as a cooking fuel.

Sector organization

In 2013, India began natural gas pricing reforms, and the government approved a new pricing scheme to further align domestic prices with international market prices and to raise investment for the sector.

As with the oil sector, India’s Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas (MOPNG) oversees natural gas exploration and production activities. MOPNG’s Directorate of Hydrocarbons functions as an upstream regulator and monitors coalbed methane projects. Until 2006, the Gas Authority of India Limited (GAIL) functioned as a near-monopoly operating India’s natural gas pipelines.

However, the government began to reform gas pricing and created the Petroleum Natural Gas Regulatory Board to regulate downstream activities such as distribution and marketing.

Different producers of natural gas have different pricing schemes in India. The government directly sets prices for public sector companies through the Administered Price Mechanism (APM), while joint-venture producers generally index their prices to international rates. LNG prices are completely market-driven and are about triple the price of the APM benchmark on average. The Indian government approved a new natural gas pricing regime in June 2013 in an effort to attract investment critical to increase domestic gas production and mitigate upstream project delays. Most of India’s gas consumers pay rates that are much lower than the prices of imported gas. The proposed pricing scheme would more closely align India’s gas prices to international market rates and attempt to create a more uniform pricing structure. The current APM benchmark rate of $4.20 per million Btu would double under the new formula, according to industry sources. Although the pricing scheme was slated to take effect on April 1, 2014, India’s oil ministry delayed the price increase until after the country’s general elections when the new government is expected to review the new pricing system and determine its course of action.

New private companies such as Petronet LNG Limited have formed in recent years aiming to benefit from growing LNG imports in India by building regasification plants. Privately-owned RIL emerged as an important upstream player in the natural gas market after discovering significant reserves in the Krishna-Godavari basin in 2002. RIL also operates the important East-West gas pipeline from Andhra Pradesh to Gujarat.

International firms have some stake in the natural gas sector. BP owns part of the KG-D6 field in the Krishna-Godavari basin, and Royal Dutch Shell has invested in potential future LNG facilities.

Exploration and production

India had 47 trillion cubic feet of natural gas reserves at the beginning of 2014, mostly located offshore. The two largest state-owned oil companies, ONGC and Oil India, dominate the country’s upstream gas sector.

According to the Oil & Gas Journal, India had 47 Tcf of proved natural gas reserves at the beginning of 2014. About 34% of total reserves are located onshore, while 66% are offshore, according to India’s Ministry of Oil and Gas. In 2002, energy companies made a number of large gas discoveries in the Krishna-Godavari (KG) basin off of India’s eastern coast, pushing up both the reserve base and production. However, production from some of the more mature fields have declined in recent years, and RIL cut the recoverable reserves of its two major gas fields in the major D6 block (D1 and D3) in the KG basin from 10.3 Tcf estimated in December 2006 to 3.1 Tcf in 2012 because of unexpected declines and reservoir performance problems.

Total gas production in India amounted to around 1.5 Tcf in 2012. The two biggest state-owned companies, ONGC and Oil India Ltd. (OIL), dominate India’s upstream gas sector. ONGC operates the Mumbai High Field, which provides a large amount of India’s natural gas supply. ONGC remains India’s largest natural gas producer, accounting for 62% of the domestic production in 2012 as reported in the company’s annual report. However, the government has encouraged private and foreign companies to enter the upstream sector in recent years. RIL is becoming a major upstream force because of natural gas discoveries in the Krishna-Godavari basin. RIL has a strategic partnership with BP, which has a 30% stake in 21 of RIL’s production-sharing contracts. Other major international oil companies do not have significant investments in India’s natural gas upstream sector. India’s MOPNG estimates that gas production continued to decline during 2013.

The KG-D6 field came online in early 2009, ramping up production to hit a peak of more than 2.4 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) or 876 Bcf per year (Bcf/y), in 2010. However, the field has experienced production shortfalls in recent years, and output dropped to 0.4 Bcf/d (146 Bcf/y) at the end of 2013. RIL and BP plan to tie in production from satellite fields and invest $5-10 billion to restore the production of the D6 block to more than 2.1 Bcf/d (767 Bcf/y) by 2020.

ONGC and Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation Limited (GSPCL) are also developing several offshore areas in Krishna-Godavari basin. Another promising producing area is the Cambay basin in western India, where independent company Oilex has done some preliminary work assessing the potential for tight natural gas.

Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas

India began awarding coalbed methane (CBM) blocks for exploration in 2001, although it has taken more than a decade to begin producing at these fields. The Indian Ministry of Oil partnered with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and ONGC to conduct a resource assessment and estimates anywhere between 9 and 92 Tcf of CBM resources both onshore and offshore India. Foreign companies have largely been absent from CBM production, leaving domestic Indian companies struggling to attract enough expertise and technology to develop these resources. Great Eastern Energy Corporation (GEEC) has developed the Raniganj block in West Bengal, with an estimated 1 Tcf of gas potential. Essar Oil and RIL have also been developing blocks in Bengal, although there has not been any significant commercial production. Total CBM production in 2013 amounted to about 5.8 Bcf.

Companies are interested in exploring the Cambay basin in Gujarat, the Assam-Arakan basin in northeast India, and the Gondwana basin in Central India for shale gas resources, although there has been no commercial production or publicly released reserve figures. In its 2013 assessment of global shale gas reserves, EIA estimates India has 96 Tcf of technically recoverable shale gas reserves. Joshi Technologies made the first shale oil discovery in Cambay Basin in mid-2010. India’s oil ministry announced that the government will unveil a shale gas and oil policy in the near future and will begin to sell shale gas development blocks, although it has not made any awards to date.

Pipelines and infrastructure

The two most important companies operating India’s large gas pipeline system are GAIL and Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited (RGTIL). GAIL, the state-owned gas transmission and marketing company, operates two major gas pipelines in northwestern India with a combined length of 3,328 miles: the Hazira-Vijaipur-Jagadishpur (HVJ) line running from Gujarat to Delhi, and the Dahej-Vijaipur (DVPL) line. The company services primarily the northwestern region of India and makes up over 70% of the country’s pipeline network. Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure (RGTIL, owned by RIL) is the biggest private investor in the gas transmission structure and brought the 881-mile East-West pipeline online in 2009 to link the promising KG-D6 gas field to GAIL’s pipeline network and demand centers in the northern and western regions. However, RIL’s East-West pipeline remains relatively underutilized as a result of lower-than-expected production from the KG-D6 field. Other players like Assam Gas Company and Gujarat State Petronet Limited (GSPL) have significant pipeline assets that service regional demand centers in northeastern India and Gujarat, respectively.

Insufficient pipeline infrastructure and lack of a nationally integrated system are key factors that constrain natural gas demand in India, although GAIL and other companies are investing in several pipeline projects. The country’s natural gas pipeline network totaled over 9,200 miles in 2013, and the current Five Year Plan proposes expanding the gas network to 18,000 miles by 2017. GAIL plans to expand its network and further integrate southern India with the pipeline system in the northwest of the country. In early 2013, GAIL commissioned the 600-mile Dabhol to Bengaluru (Bangalore) pipeline, the first line to connect the southern part of the country to the national grid. GAIL also plans to build a pipeline from its newly commissioned LNG regasification terminal at Kochi in southwestern India to Mangalore and other parts of southern India, although regulatory and land rights issues have delayed the project.

The Indian government has considered importing natural gas via pipeline through several international projects, although many of these have proved unfeasible. In 2005, negotiations over a transnational pipeline between the Indian and Bangladesh governments fell through. In 2006, India withdrew from the Iran-Pakistan-India (IPI) pipeline project. However, the government still participates in a pipeline project to import natural gas from Turkmenistan to India. The Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) project, also known as the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline, has seen a decade of discussion, although major geopolitical risks and technical challenges have prevented the project from actually starting. However, the countries have made some progress in moving TAPI forward. The partners signed a framework agreement in 2010 and agreed on unified transit tariffs for the route in early 2012. In May 2012, India signed gas supply and purchase agreements with Turkmenistan. In early February 2013, India’s government approved a special-purpose legal entity to which participating members of the pipeline would contribute investment funds. In November 2013, the four participants appointed the Asian Development Bank (ADB) as the project’s technical and financial advisor. The ADB estimated the pipeline’s cost at about $10-12 billion.

Liquefied natural gas

Indian companies are investing in new regasification facilities to meet the country’s rising natural gas demand. India was the world’s fourth-largest liquefied natural gas importer in 2013.

Liquefied natural gas (LNG) has become an important part of India’s energy portfolio since the country began importing it from Qatar in 2004. In 2013, India was the world’s fourth-largest LNG importer, importing 638 Bcf, or 6%, of global trade, according to data from IHS Energy. Petronet, a joint venture between GAIL, ONGC, IOC, and several foreign firms, is the major importer of LNG supplies to India. Petronet owns two existing LNG terminals, Dahej (480 Bcf/y) and Kochi (120 Bcf/y). Shell (74% share) and Total (26% share) jointly own the Hazira terminal (240 Bcf/y), which operates as a merchant facility, importing only short-term and spot cargoes at present. India’s total regasification capacity now stands at 936 Bcf, and terminal owners have proposed capacity expansions at all existing terminals. Expansion under construction at Dahej will increase the terminal’s capacity to 720 Bcf by 2016.

Unexpected production declines in India’s KG-D6 gas field mean the country must rely on higher LNG imports. Average imported LNG prices have increased to three times the price of domestically produced natural gas because they are not subject to the government setting prices through the Administered Price Mechanism (see Sector Organization). Indian producers such as RIL have asked the government to raise the wellhead price for gas (the wholesale price at the point of production) as a way of justifying investment into deepwater projects. If the proposed gas pricing reform is implemented, there will be greater investment incentives for domestic gas development that could increase competition for LNG imports.

Indian companies have invested in increasing the country’s LNG regasification capacity in recent years to meet rising demand. In early 2013, GAIL, NTPC, and several other smaller players restarted the Dabhol project, originally proposed by now-defunct Enron, which includes a regasification terminal to fuel three gas-fired power stations. Dabhol LNG also ships natural gas to southern India through the new pipeline to Bengaluru. GAIL is installing a breakwater facility to double Dabhol’s capacity by 2017. Petronet’s LNG terminal at Kochi was commissioned in late 2013. However, the terminal is experiencing low utilization because of delays in the approval and construction of a proposed pipeline to Mangalore and other parts of southern India, according to PFC Energy. The eastern side of India lacks pipeline infrastructure and gas supply following declines in the KG basin; thus companies are quickly planning terminals to come online in the next few years. IOC proposed the Ennore project in Tamil Nadu in southeastern India. Other proposed projects are located along India’s eastern coast include three floating terminal projects at Kakinada and one at Gangavaram. Several proposed regasification projects along the western coast include GSPC’s Mundra terminal in Gujarat, expected to be built by 2016.

Qatar’s RasGas is India’s sole long-term supplier of natural gas, with two contracts for a total of 360 Bcf. In 2013, Qatar was the source of 84% of India’s total LNG imports, according to IHS Energy. India has been an active importer of spot cargoes following interruptions in the KG-D6 field production after 2010 and began receiving LNG cargoes from a variety of exporting countries. Nigeria, Egypt, and Yemen have become India’s largest short-term LNG suppliers.

Indian LNG importers actively sought supply from various new LNG sources and signed several short- and long-term purchase agreements in the past few years. India signed agreements to receive supply from Australia’s Gorgon LNG terminal and several U.S. terminals (Sabine Pass, Cove Point, and Main Pass) and from the portfolio of various global LNG suppliers such as BG, GDF Suez, Gas Natural Fenosa, and Gazprom. As Indian companies become more active in pursuing overseas upstream oil and gas plays, OIL has invested in gas projects in Canada (Pacific Northwest LNG) and an offshore gas project in Mozambique (jointly with ONGC) to secure LNG imports for India.

Coal

Coal is India’s primary source of energy. The country has the world’s fifth-largest coal reserves, and ranked third largest in terms of both production and consumption in 2012. The state retains a near-monopoly on the coal sector. The power sector makes up the majority of coal consumption.

Coal is India’s primary source of energy, and the country was the third-largest global consumer in 2012. The country has the fifth-largest coal reserves in the world. At the same time, the coal sector is one of the most centralized and inefficient sectors in India. Two state-owned companies have a near-monopoly on production and distribution. The country also faces a widening gap between demand and supply. Although production has moderately increased by about 4% per year since 2007, producers have failed to reach the government’s production targets. Meanwhile, demand grew more than 7% annually between 2007 and 2012, and reached 826 million short tons in 2012. Because coal production cannot keep pace with demand, particularly from the power sector, India has met more of its coal needs with imports.

The power sector is the largest consumer of coal, accounting for 69% of coal consumption in 2011, according to the IEA. Because power plants rely so heavily on coal, coal shortages are a major contributor to shortfalls in electricity generation and consequent blackouts throughout the country. Also, coal demand has escalated in the past few years from the power sector, which encountered problems accessing natural gas supply and lower hydroelectricity-sourced generation during the weak monsoon season in 2012.

Steel and cement industries are also significant coal consumers. India has limited reserves of coking coal, which is an important raw material for steel production. The state of Jharkhand holds most of India’s coking coal reserves, but it does not supply enough to meet the industry’s needs. Because of this shortage, India imports large quantities of coking coal from abroad.

Sector organization

India’s government took control of the country’s coal reserves with the 1973 Coal Mines Nationalization Act, establishing Coal India Limited (CIL) in 1975 as the state-owned sole producer and aggregating coal production and investment. After 1993 it tried to encourage foreign and private investment into the coal sector through the National Mineral Policy. By 2000, the government deregulated coal prices, allowing CIL and other companies to increase prices when there is a rise in the cost of production. However, the Ministry of Coal and Mines continues to control the distribution of coal resources and subsidies to various companies. In 2007, the government passed the New Coal Distribution Policy that attempted to allocate limited coal supplies to priority sectors, particularly the power and fertilizer industries, and India’s 12th Five Year Plan calls for CIL to link indigenous coal production with part of the fuel requirements of power plant projects coming online by 2017.

CIL remains the country’s largest coal producer; and they produced about 81% of the country’s coal in 2012, according to the IEA. CIL underwent an initial public offering (IPO) in 2010 and divested 10% of its government share, India’s largest IPO to date. Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), another public-owned company, was responsible for nearly 10% of the country’s coal production in 2012, mainly to the southern region of the country, according to India’s Ministry of Coal. Other smaller companies operate throughout the country.

Exploration and production

India ranks as the third-largest coal producer in the world. However, the country continues to experience regulatory, land acquisition, technical, and distribution challenges that limit production growth and create bottlenecks hindering efficient transportation of coal to key demand centers.

India had 66.8 billion short tons of proven coal reserves in 2011, the fifth-largest in the world (third-largest reserves in anthracite and bituminous after the United States and China), according to the World Energy Council. The Indian Ministry of Coal estimated proven reserves to be 137 billion short tons in 2012. Indian coal typically has high ash, low sulfur content, and a low-to-medium calorific value.

Most coal reserves are located in the eastern parts of the country. Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, and Odisha account for approximately 64% of the country’s coal reserves, according to the IEA. Other significant coal-producing states include West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Maharashtra.

India is the third-largest global coal producer, with coal output nearly doubling between 2000 and 2012 to 650 million short tons. Despite its sizeable reserves and rising production, India has increasing supply shortages and systemic problems with its mining industry. According to an IEA report, about 90% of the country’s coal mines are opencast, or surface, mines (less than 1,000 feet deep), which is more cost-effective and less dangerous for workers but causes more environmental impact. India lacks more advanced technology to engage in large-scale underground mining operations, which keeps productivity levels low. A lack of competition within the coal sector inhibits private and foreign investment that could be used to improve underground mining techniques. Also, many coal deposits are located in areas that pose environmental issues or potential dislocation of people. Regulatory hurdles continue to pose delays in obtaining environmental and land acquisition approvals for mining companies.

India’s coal mines are also located far from the highest-demand markets in southern and western India, posing a significant logistical challenge to coal producers and distributors. Railcars transport the majority of Indian coal, according to CIL. Limited railway capacity, delays to railroad projects, and high transport costs to demand centers are other factors negatively affecting India’s coal output and deliveries to users.

Trade

Although traditionally not a major importer of coal, India has imported small volumes of coking coal for over two decades to meet high demand in the steel and iron industry. The country’s recent supply shortages spurred India’s significant increase of coal imports over the past few years from several key exporting countries. India purchased 179 million short tons from overseas and was the third-largest coal importer behind China and Japan in 2012. India imports thermal (steam) coal used in power plants mainly from Indonesia and South Africa and coking coal for steel production from Australia. Indonesia is the largest source of coal imports to India, accounting for 55% of total coal imports in 2012.

Electricity

India had 249 gigawatts of installed electricity generation capacity connected to the national network in early 2014, mostly coal-powered plants. Because of insufficient fuel supply and power generation and transmission capacity, the country suffers from a severe electricity shortage, leading to rolling blackouts.

As of May 2014, India had 249 gigawatts (GW) of utility-based installed electricity generating capacity, mostly from coal-fired power plants, according to India’s Central Electricity Authority (CEA). Generation capacity from smaller captive power plants, or those that serve specific industries for in-house consumption and may not be connected to the grid, registered about 39 GW in 2014. According to the IEA, installed capacity from coal and natural gas power plants is heavily clustered in the more populated western region of the country, particularly in Maharashtra and Gujarat. For example, Maharashtra, the largest Indian state by GDP (its capital is Mumbai, the country’s largest city), contains 14% of the nation’s generating capacity. Hydropower is the second largest source of electricity, accounting for 16% of India’s utility-based installed capacity in early 2014 and supplying about 13% of the country’s electricity in 2011. The industrial sector has been a key driver of electricity consumption in the past decade, as a result of India’s rapidly expanding economy.

India suffers from severe shortages of electricity, particularly during peak hours of demand, and often experiences shut-downs lasting from several hours to days in certain areas. India suffered an unprecedented electricity blackout for two days in July 2012 that affected an estimated 680 million people across the country’s northern states. This outage highlights the increasing pressure on India’s power system to secure more fuel supplies and infrastructure investment in each stage of power transmission. Utilization rates in Indian power plants using fossil fuels have fallen steadily since 2007 (from a peak of nearly 79%) to about 70% in 2013 because of disruptions in steady domestic fuel supplies and transmission and distribution constraints, according to the IEA and India’s CEA. Deficiencies in coal and natural gas supply to power plants have caused some plant owners to curtail operations and even mothball some plants. Transmission and distribution losses and technical problems in moving electricity between various states also impair system reliability.

Other factors contributing to power shortages are the lag of power capacity expansions and the need to replace older, less efficient units. India has historically fallen short of its capacity addition targets for electricity, although the country has successfully attracted private investment for power plant construction in the past decade. In its 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17), India plans to add 120 GW of power capacity to the grid, with more than half of it composed of coal-fired generation capacity. By early 2014, more than a third of this capacity had been brought online.

In efforts to diversify the generation portfolio and offset some carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel sources, the government is promoting renewable energy use, with a 32-GW planned capacity expansion from sources such as wind, solar, biomass, and waste during the current Five Year Plan. For instance, India launched a national solar mission with a goal of adding 22 GW of solar capacity by 2022.

In addition, significant parts of the country, particularly in rural areas, do not have access to electricity. The Indian government reported overall household electrification in India was 75%, representing more than 300 million people without electricity, in 2011. While 94% of urban households had electricity, only 67% of rural households had access, and often the rural consumers experienced much more frequently interrupted electricity supply. The government began a program in 2005 called Rajiv Gandhi Grameen Vidyutikaran Yojana to provide all villages electricity within five years through significant investments in rural electrification. While the program has succeeded in electrifying many rural areas, power supply is unreliable and frequent blackouts persist.

Sector organization

The Ministry of Power is responsible for planning and implementing India’s power sector policy, with various subunits handling different parts of the sector, including thermal, hydropower, and distribution. The CEA advises the central government on long- and short-term policy planning. The Central Electricity Regulatory Commission and State Electricity Regulatory Commissions set generation and transmission policies.

The source of India’s current electricity regulatory framework is the 2003 Electricity Act, which attempted to reform the state electricity boards, open access to transmission and distribution networks, and create state electricity regulatory commissions (SERCs) to manage electricity on a regional basis. Several key private investors, namely Reliance Power, Tata Power, and Essar Power, have entered India’s power generation sector, and the share of private sector to state-run generation capacity is on the rise. The government has not fully implemented many parts of the Act, and India’s electricity sector continues to face serious challenges in procurement and distribution of sufficient fuel for generation.

Power tariffs for end-users are highly regulated and kept low for the residential and agricultural sectors. Low retail prices often do not match higher generation costs, triggering financial losses for transmission and distribution companies and lower investment in electricity distribution. Higher costs from imported fuels and price swings in international fuel markets create financial constraints for power producers who cannot pass full costs to some of their customers. In order to mitigate supply risk from fuel sources with high price volatility and reduce carbon dioxide emissions growth, India’s government is encouraging more generation from renewable energy sources.

The government established the Power Grid Corporation of India (POWERGRID) to operate five regional electricity grids, while state transmission utilities (with some private sector participation) run most transmission and distribution segments. Although the central government finances electricity development projects, delivering electricity to customers is the responsibility of state governments. Therefore, more-efficient states such as Maharashtra tend to have better electricity availability. The southern grid was integrated with the other four grids at the end of 2013, creating a more unified national grid. However, the transmission sector still requires substantial investment for capacity expansion as well as improved grid management to ensure power supply reliability across states and to reduce technical losses in transmission and distribution.

Different states also have varying energy mixes based on their natural resource endowment. For example, Gujarat is close to major gas fields and LNG terminals, allowing regional power plants to use a larger share of natural gas. Renewable power generation is concentrated in a few states so far. Wind power generation, which makes up the bulk of non hydroelectric renewable capacity, is found in southern states such as Tamil Nadu, and solar power generation is located in Gujarat and Rajasthan. Hydroelectricity is located mostly in the northeastern states.

Fossil fuels

Fossil fuel generation, mostly from coal, accounted for about 81% of total electricity generation in the country in 2011. Coal-fired power plants dominate India’s electricity generation sector and accounted for nearly 148 GW (or 59%) of the utility-based installed capacity in early 2014. India plans to add more than 72 GW in fossil fuel-fired power capacity to the grid, with almost 70 GW from coal-fired stations, between 2012 and 2017. The government is attracting private investment for its Ultra-Mega Power Plants Program, which involves installing large-scale, coal-fired supercritical plants that are more energy-efficient for plant operations. Many of these plants are under construction, and about half of the proposed coal-fired capacity slated to come online during the 12th Five Year Plan (through 2017) are designed with more advanced technology. To alleviate fuel transportation constraints, these plants will be located near domestic coal supplies and the coasts to accommodate imports.

Natural gas fuels most of the remaining share of fossil fuel-fired electricity generation. After the newly developed Krishna Godavari basin (including the KG-D6 field) began producing significant amounts of natural gas and India began importing LNG during the past decade, natural gas use in power began to rise. Since 2011, natural gas-fired generation has waned, and some plants have ceased operation since the KG-D6 field production began to decline. Natural gas-fired generation capacity was nearly 23 GW in early 2014, or 9% of total generation capacity. The government’s expansion plans for gas-fired capacity through 2017 are much lower compared to other fuel sources. It plans to use natural gas-fired power as a supply source for peak requirements.

Hydroelectric

India was the world’s seventh-largest producer of hydroelectric power in 2012, with 115 billion kilowatthours generated. Total utility-based installed capacity of hydropower in early 2014 was nearly 41 GW, according to the CEA.

India benefits from a tropical climate, which gives the country increased hydropower potential, particularly during the summer months. In particular, states with significant river systems such as Himachal Pradesh, Jammu, Kashmir, and Uttarakhand benefit from energy surpluses as a result of abundant precipitation during the monsoon period. However, coal and natural gas generation is related inversely to hydropower capacity; when hydropower utilization falls, for example with a weak monsoon season, coal-fired power plants will generate more electricity to compensate for the shortfall. In 2012, India experienced a drought during the summer and saw a dip in hydroelectric generation which reversed in 2013 when the monsoon season was stronger than normal.

Nuclear

India has 20 operational nuclear reactors at six nuclear power plants with a generation capacity of 4.8 GW, representing about 2% of total utility-based generation capacity. The Kudankulam plant in the southern state of Tamil Nadu was connected to the electricity grid at the end of 2013 and is expected to become operational in mid-2014 according to the Nuclear Power Corporation of India, adding another 1 GW to the country’s nuclear capacity. As of April 2014, six additional reactors with a combined 4.3 GW of capacity are under construction and expected to come online by 2017. As India seeks reliable electricity supply to accommodate its swiftly growing power demand, the government has indicated that it plans to increase the nuclear share of total generation from 3% in 2011 to 25% by 2050.

In September 2008, India became a party to the Nuclear Suppliers’ Group agreement, which opened access to nuclear technology and expertise through several cooperative agreements. The government has signed several such agreements with countries including the United States, Russia, France, the United Kingdom, South Korea, and Canada. In addition, India gained access to reactor parts and uranium fuel from other countries as a result of these agreements.

Indians protested nuclear power after the Fukushima disaster in Japan, and the government responded by organizing safety audits for existing reactors. The Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) conducted stress tests of all nuclear power plants. The Indian government has a three-stage nuclear development plan to gradually shift from powering reactors with natural uranium to accumulating reserves of other fissile materials such as thorium. While the Indian nuclear sector historically has had limited access to uranium, it has abundant thorium reserves that can power more sophisticated reactors. India’s commitment to the thorium fuel cycle sets it apart from most nations with nuclear power programs.

Biomass and waste

The lack of electricity in some parts of India results in a substantial use of traditional biomass and waste products primarily for household uses in rural areas. A small portion of biomass and bagasse contributes to power plant feedstock.

Rural areas of India tend to rely on traditional biomass (including firewood, animal dung, and agricultural residue) for cooking, heating, and lighting because they lack access to other energy supplies. These sources can be burned directly to produce heat and electricity.

Large parts of India rely on biomass as the primary fuel for cooking. According to the 2011 India census, 62.5% of rural households use firewood as the primary fuel for cooking, 12.3% use crop residue as the primary cooking fuel, and 10.9% use dung. By contrast, more than 3% of urban households use crop residue and dung, and only 20% use firewood as the primary fuel source for cooking. These uses can cause health problems from exposure to waste products and pollution or environmental problems when forests or crops are harvested unsustainably. On the whole, about 66% of India’s total population used traditional biomass for cooking purposes in 2011, according to the IEA.

India also uses biomass in the power sector. According to the CEA, India had at least 3.4 GW of utility-based installed capacity in biomass power and bagasse-based cogeneration plants as of mid-2013. India’s Ministry of New and Renewable Energy reports the country has 18 GW of potential biomass electricity generation capacity and 5 GW of potential bagasse-based generation. A large amount of biomass used for electricity generation comes from bagasse (crushed sugarcane or sorghum stalks), which can be used in combustion-powered generators. Biodiesel and other liquid biofuels consumption in India is fairly low and mostly comes from several states that mandate 5% blending of ethanol in gasoline.

Source: eurasiareview