Budget 2014 positive step for energy security, say experts

0 comments
The importance given to renewable energy and climate change adaptation in the union budget 2014-2015 has been welcomed by experts, but they feel the projects need to be executed in a proper manner. Sectors like agriculture, the backbone of the masses' economy in village, will receive an impetus as these areas experience the ravages of climate change first hand, they said. 

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley Thursday announced the establishment of a 'National Adaptation Fund' for climate change. As an initial sum, an amount of Rs.100 crore will be transferred to the fund. "Climate changes is a reality which all of us have to face together. Agriculture as an activity is most prone to the vagaries of climate change," he said in the budget speech. 

The experts said it was necessary for the government to implement the projects in a proper manner manner. 

"We will have to wait and watch...how the plans are laid out and how beneficial will these turn out for the common man," Mili Majumdar, director, sustainable habitats at Association for Development and Research of Sustainable Habitats, The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), told IANS. 

Moreover, thrust should be given on developing indigenous green technologies. 

"There are two things to be considered... are you putting the money in developing technologies or in procuring technologies...It would be a lot cheaper to engineer our own technology," Mainak Das, assistant professor, department of biological sciences and bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, told IANS. 

Lauding the move as "fantastic", Joyashree Roy, initiator and co-ordinator, Global Change Programme at the Jadavpur University here, said developmental projects with respect to climate change mitigation will receive a boost which is much needed as "India is a highly impacted country". 

"This means climate change adaptation will become sustainable. It's a step forward... as the agriculture sector is one of the sectors that is immensely affected," Roy told IANS. This would ensure growth and development go hand in hand with environmental protection and climate change measures, Roy said. 

Echoing Roy, solar energy expert S.P. Gonchaudhury, who is also the advisor to the West Bengal state government's power department, pointed out that as many as 0.4 billion people in India do not have access to energy. 

Factoring in this gap, he said the stress on renewables was much appreciated. 

In addition, Gonchaudhury said globally it was a signal that India was "committed to reducing" carbon emissions. "Not only the UK, I think other countries like the US would be keen to invest in India on renewables," he said. 

For the renewable and clean energy sectors, Jaitley proposed to take up Ultra Mega Solar Power Projects in Rajasthan, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu and Laddakh in Jammu and Kashmir. A sum of Rs.500 crore was allocated for this purpose. 

He also allocated a sum of Rs.400 crore for launching a scheme for solar power driven agricultural pump sets and water pumping stations. An additional amount of Rs.100 core has been earmarked for the development of 1 MW solar parks on the banks of canals. 

Jaitley said implementation of Green Energy Corridor Projects will be accelerated in this financial year to facilitate evacuation of renewable energy across the country. "The decision is welcome...it shows that we are moving forward keeping all concerns in mind," Majumdar said.

Source: ET

Investment worth $10 bn hanging on gas price clarity: GE

0 comments
General Electric vice-chairman John Rice would like to see more discussion on modernising freight rail system. He says a lot of investment would be needed to modernize it.  On its deal with Alstom, Rice says it would be good for India. However, he is yet to decide on Alstom's India future - whether it will continue to stay listed in India or not.

He believes the new government must look at encouraging ease of doing business and reduce regulatory burden. He feels the Modi government will push through reforms. According to him, there is a need for clarity on gas prices as investments worth USD 10 billion are tied up by companies. He says: “It would be terrific if clarity on gas prices comes in 90 days.” GE wants to make large investments in India’s gas market. But the investment would be less if gas price is significantly lower than market price, he adds. GE is also looking to expand its healthcare business. Rice says GE is always on the lookout for potential acquisitions. It also plans to look at Indian JVs in power generation, oil and gas and healthcare sectors. Below is the verbatim transcript of John Rice's interview with CNBC-TV18 

Q: It is a very different India since the time we last had you on CNBC-TV18. We have a new government in place and this government is making all the right noises when it comes to taking the reform agenda forward. How confident are you feeling about the India story as a long time India investor? 

A: We are encouraged and confident. The Prime Minister's track record doesn’t need to be explained by me. The people that he has assembled around him are can do people and so we are very optimistic about the prospects for India. They are talking about investment, they are talking about infrastructure and those are things that we talk about. 

Q: Speaking of GEs interest in India and as I pointed out GE has been a long time investor in India. You have stayed with the Indian economy through good times and bad but in the context of specific announcements that have come in from the government already – it’s barely six weeks old but let me ask you about the Railway Budget in specific which was unveiled on Tuesday. The government has talked about foreign direct investment in railway infrastructure, has talked about promoting public private partnership which hasn’t really taken off in the railways. How confident are you feeling about the railway story in India which is something that I know GE has been betting on for a very long time? 

A: We would like to see in the Budget a little more discussion about modernising the existing freight rail system. We think that is also important in addition to new technologies like high speed rail. Those are relevant and important but they touch a smaller segment of the population. So, we would look for a little broader role for investment in rail that would include the traditional freight rail system which needs to be modernised and needs to be upgraded where we think we can play a role. 

Q: Are you enthused because you talked about freight and yesterday the railway minister said that this government’s target is to make India the largest freight carrier in the world. Does that enthuse you and if they were to lay out the specifics what kind of investments could we potentially be talking about?

A: Certainly several hundred million dollars. If you look at what it will take to fully modernise the freight rail system and do what the minister suggested which we think is important, at the end of the day freight has an enormous role to play and the movement of freight in India's economy and we think that is just going to grow in the years ahead. So, we support those comments and we think that there needs to be a form of investment and public private partnership around that. We are prepared to work with the government in that capacity and we would like to start tomorrow. 

Q: The government has talked about inviting FDI, of course the matter is pending cabinet approval, not in railway operations but in railway infrastructure. The government also has big plans for bullet trains and a high speed railway network, so on and so forth, do you believe that foreign investors are going to be takers for this story? 

A: I do. We have in the past over the last 10 years, we have demonstrated several times our willingness to be an investor in the rail modernisation programme here. For different reasons the projects did not move forward. We think the time is right, we think this is the government. We appreciate and support what the rail minister is saying and we want to be part of the process and we are prepared to be one of those investors. 

Q: GE’s global deal with Alstom will also result in ownership change of Alstom India and Alstom T&D, what is this going to now mean for GE’s infrastructure story and infrastructure play in India with ownership change of both these Alstom companies? 

A: We are still in the process of working through the details and it will take us six to nine months to be able to close this and get all the regulatory approvals and do everything we need to do to actually complete the deal but we are very optimistic. Alstom brings a very established presence in India, about 8000 employees, I think when we are done we will have over 20,000 employees in India, significant expansion of our manufacturing base here, some important joint ventures with important Indian companies. So, for us in India the combination of GE and Alstom gives us an even better foundation to work from. 

Q: Share with us what you can specifically for the kind of opportunity that Alstom will give GE in power infrastructure, the power transmission space specifically. How confident are you feeling about that given the fact that this government is talking about power sector reforms and also big renewable energy push? 

A: The government is talking about the need for reforms and we think this government will push through and make that happen. The awesome capabilities married with GE capabilities which we believe are very complementary give us a much better framework with which to support and push forward these reforms. So, in the context of what we do as a company and what the country needs and what the government wants private investors to do we think this is 1+1=3 combination. 

Q: I don’t know if you can share details with us or you have specifics worked out just yet but both listed entities in India, would you like to remain listed, would you like to take the delisting route once the transaction is complete? 

A: We are still working through those details and over the coming months as the process for putting this transaction together takes place we will be able to talk in more detail about exactly what will happen and how it will happen. 

Q: One of the reforms that seem to have gotten delayed even further is the reform related to aligning gas prices to market rates. The Rangarajan formula we talked about the last time, you were hopeful that the government would implement the new price regime for gas prices - that hasn’t happened. It is likely to be at least another three months wait. Bob Dudley of BP has called the experience in India on gas pricing disappointing to say the least. How would you assess the current situation and do you believe that this has been a disappointment? 

A: It is certainly important for this to be resolved. Depending on how you keep score there are tens of billions of dollars of investments that are tied up in this part of reform. The wait for clarity, BP is going to make big investments, Indian companies are going to make big investments, companies like GE will participate in our way and the government is talking about the need for foreign investment and talking about the need for infrastructure and this fits hand in glove with those needs. So, clarity and decision around gas pricing has never been more important. If it comes out in the next 90 days that would be terrific but it is very important that we get some resolution which gives investors the clarity they need to move forward with these important projects.

Source: Moneycontrol

Natural gas allocation policy to be rejigged

0 comments
In a major revamp of natural gas allocation policy, the government will give city gas projects, selling CNG to automobiles and piped cooking gas to households, top-most priority for receipt of domestically-produced gas.

Presently, urea-manufacturing fertiliser plants have the first right over the domestically produced gas, followed by liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) plants and power stations. City gas distribution (CGD) projects are ranked fourth currently.

This priority listing is now being changed to give CGD firms like Indraprastha Gas (IGL), which sells CNG to automobiles and piped gas to households in national capital, top priority, official sources said.
CGD firms like IGL currently get 8.32 million standard cubic meters per day of gas out of total domestic supplies of about 77 mmscmd.

As city gas projects get rolled out in newer cities, the requirement of the sector will grow and so the government is now giving it top priority. Sources said compressed natural gas (CNG) and piped natural gas (PNG) are clean fuels and will help replace subsidised diesel in automobiles and LPG in households respectively.

According to the new allocation policy being finalised, additional requirement for CGD will be first met by imposing proportionate cuts in the domestic gas presently being supplied to sectors other than priority sectors as decided by the oil ministry. 

Plants providing inputs to stretegic sectors of atomic energy and space research will get the second priority, followed by plants that can extract higher fractions from natural gas. Gas-based urea plants will rank fourth in the priority list and power stations fifth. Since domestic gas production is now stagnant, it is being proposed to freeze allocation to all sectors expect CND and LPG sector, at supply levels of 2013-14.

In 2013-14, fertiliser plants received 29.79 mmscmd of gas. Power plants got 25.59 mmscmd while LPG
extraction plants received 1.83 mmscmd. Petrochemical plants received 3.32 mmscmd while refineries got 1.89 mmscmd and steel plants 1.32 mmscmd.

Sources said incremental production from NELP blocks like KG-D6 and Gujarat State Petroleum Corp's (GSPC) Deendayal gas will be allocated as per the decision taken in the meeting of an Empowered Group of
Ministers (EGoM) on August 23, 2013. The EGoM had decided that incremental gas would go to power plants. Sources said that in the current gas utilisation policy there are ambiguities. 

Source: FE

MEA seeks to help oil ministry secure India’s energy interests

0 comments
Taking the Narendra Modi-led government’s theme of using diplomacy to secure economic interests forward, foreign minister Sushma Swaraj has asked the oil ministry to prepare a list of areas and countries where her ministry can pitch in to contribute towards India’s energy security, said Dharmendra Pradhan, India’s petroleum minister, in an interview on Thursday. “The foreign minister has asked me for a list of areas and countries where her ministry can help us. It’s not that it has not happened before but now it is happening aggressively,” Pradhan said.

This comes at a time when India’s energy security future remains clouded by sputtering investments in power, hydrocarbons and coal mining at home and troubled forays abroad, even as the new government, which rode to power on a promise of prosperity and economic revival, settles down. Given the foreign policy imperatives for India’s energy security, the petroleum minister has also appointed an Indian Foreign Service officer as his personal assistant. “This government has started thinking in that direction (forming an energy security doctrine). When we know that there is limitation to its speed and scale, despite that the prime minister clubbed the ministries for a presentation, which all ministries were called to—oil and gas, power, coal and non-renewable energy.

This is a first indication that let’s have a big canvas so that there could be a joint strategy for energy requirements,” said Pradhan. While the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had articulated the need for energy security in its election manifesto, India, which is highly dependent on imports to meet its energy demand, is yet to evolve a “long-term national energy security policy”. India, the world’s fourth-largest energy-consuming nation after the US, China and Russia, accounts for 4.4% of global energy consumption. India imports 80% of its crude oil and 25% of its natural gas requirements.

The country’s energy demand is expected to more than double by 2035, from less than 700 million tonnes of oil equivalent (mtoe) now to around 1,500mtoe, according to India’s oil ministry. “Our prime minister has given an important policy statement about what should our foreign departments do. He said that foreign departments should protect India’s economic interests,” Pradhan said. Progress with fuel pipelines—once seen as the one-stop solution for energy woes—has been dismal. Some attempts to achieve energy security through overseas investments have run into trouble such as ONGC Videsh Ltd’s (OVL’s) $2.1 billion acquisition of Imperial Energy Corp. Plc’s Siberian deposits. OVL, which is tasked with securing energy resources overseas, has also faced difficulties in Venezuela, South Sudan and Syria. Till now, the company has invested Rs.78,000 crore in overseas energy assets. Also, the security situation in Iraq, a key supplier of crude oil to Asia’s third-largest economy, has been a cause of concern. India imports 12.9% of its requirements, or 21-22 million tonnes, from Iraq.

As a supplier, the country has displaced Iran, targeted by Western sanctions because of its suspected nuclear weapons programme. However, Pradhan dismissed such concerns. In response to a question about India arranging for alternate supply, Pradhan said, “I said that when there is a crisis in Iraq that I will do that. But there is no crisis in Iraq. Whatever our offtake from Iraq is, we have done that. Around 40-45% has already been completed. India’s procurement linkages are far-off from the areas in Iraq where there is a crisis. Our procurement is safe. We are still getting oil.” “We have started receiving good news. Oil has stabilized.

These are good signs. Had there been no such crisis in Iraq, we would have got even more consumer-friendly rate to India. Iraq forced us into some problems but despite that we have managed to do this.” Pradhan also wants the public sector undertakings (PSUs) under his ministry to change their style of functioning, and open up positions to private sector experts. “PSUs are important organs of this oil economy. They need to change with time, especially their top leadership. A lot of new talent join them, especially from engineering and marketing, therefore, there is no shortage of intellectual capacity there. What it needs is a leadership who can have a world view, who can get best technology, best marketing practices of the world and have a knack of social profiting.

Therefore, we need to strengthen its leadership with dynamism and accountability,” Pradhan said. On its part, the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance has expressed its willingness to open up these positions to private sector experts for providing effective governance, with the desired priority skills being set as “high integrity” and “high efficiency”. “Even within the country, there are a lot of models where we have world-class competency. So, we need to pull together all the best practices. PSU leadership will have to update themselves. They have to be more focused and dynamic if they have to compete with the world giants,” Pradhan said. “When I said that this government is going towards a paradigm shift for governance, this, (opening PSU leadership positions to the private sector) is also a part of that. If we need to make this country a world economic power, we will have to do whatever is required.”

Source: LiveMint

Budget 2014: Should Rationalise Tax for Oil and Gas Sector

0 comments
During the last decade, India's oil and gas imports have been rising due to increased oil and gas consumption. The domestic production has been unable to keep pace with the rising demand. Given this, apart from various policy measures, the government can initiate fiscal measures to boost the investment in oil and gas sector and secure economic growth.

From E&P (exploration and production) companies' perspective, several issues on the tax holiday for production of mineral oils need resolution. Firstly, tax authorities have been denying this benefit on natural gas on the basis that natural gas does not fall within ambit of the term 'mineral oils'. They also argue that a specific reference has been made where the legislature intended to provide tax holiday benefit (such as for blocks awarded under NELP VIII). Considering that production of natural gas is adjunct to production of petroleum, there ought to be parity in the tax treatment of natural gas and petroleum.

Secondly, tax holiday provision was retrospectively amended from 1999-2000 to specify that all blocks licensed under a single contract shall be considered as a single undertaking. Given the very nature of this business, wells within the same block commence production on staggered basis. This amendment effectively results in denial of tax holiday benefit to wells that commence production later and thus, lesser benefit to E&P companies. Well-wise or field-wise tax holiday claim should be allowed.

Thirdly, due to high exploration costs, E&P companies are unable to benefit from the tax holiday as they make miniscule profits/losses in the first few years. It is recommended that the period for claiming tax holiday be aligned with the infrastructure sector i.e., amend the current 7 years from year of commercial production to 10 out of 15 years from year of commercial production.

Presently, deduction for unsuccessful exploration expenses is allowed only in respect of a surrendered area. Such requirement of surrendering the area for availing deduction for abortive expenditure induce E&P companies to surrender the area without fully exploring the same, which is not in interest of the industry and the country. Therefore, the Government should withdraw this condition.

Presumptive taxation regime is available to foreign oilfield services providers whereby 10 per cent of gross revenue is deemed to be profit. In 2010, an amendment was introduced carving out technical services from presumptive taxation and subjecting them to net basis taxation. This has significantly increased compliance cost, upended well settled positions and led to rise in litigation. The government ought to withdraw this amendment as this translates into reduced interest from reputed service providers to work in India.

In the mid-stream and downstream sector, investment-linked incentive of 100 per cent deduction of pre-commencement capital expenditure is allowed for laying and operating a cross country natural gas or crude or petroleum oil pipeline network for distribution, including storage facilities. This incentive ought to be extended to dedicated pipelines and intra-city and intra-state gas distribution networks as this will help develop infrastructure required for supporting economic growth.

Further, 10 year profit-linked incentive available to infrastructure facility should be extended to LNG terminals in view of huge expenditure incurred to set up and operate the terminals.

On the indirect tax front, natural gas is not a 'declared' good, unlike coal and crude oil and hence, natural gas is subject to VAT rate of up to 20 per cent, instead of a cap of 4 per cent applicable to declared goods. Declared goods status should be extended to natural gas in order to optimize VAT liability.

Considering the huge capital investment and uncertainty involved in the exploration activity, service tax leviable on exploration activities should be withdrawn

Source:  E&Y

Natural Gas As A Pillar Of Growth

0 comments















Source: ceew.in/

India Energy Profile(Analysis): Economic Growth Fuels Increased Need for Energy

0 comments
India was the fourth-largest energy consumer in the world after China, the United States, and Russia in 2011, and its need for energy supply continues to climb as a result of the country’s dynamic economic growth and modernization over the past several years. India’s economy has grown at an average annual rate of approximately 7% since 2000, and it proved relatively resilient following the 2008 global financial crisis.

The latest slowdown in growth of emerging market countries and higher inflation levels, combined with domestic supply and infrastructure constraints, have reduced India’s annual inflation-adjusted gross domestic product (GDP) growth from a high of 10.3% in 2010 to 4.4% in 2013, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). India was the third-largest economy in the world in 2013, as measured on a purchasing power parity basis. Risks to economic growth in India include high debt levels, infrastructure deficiencies, delays in structural reforms, and political polarization between the country’s two largest political parties, the Indian National Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

The BJP, elected as the majority party in May 2014 to govern India in the following five years, faces challenges to meet the country’s growing energy demand by securing affordable energy supplies and attracting investment for infrastructure development. Highly regulated fuel prices for consumers, fuel subsidies that are shouldered by the government and state-owned upstream companies, and inconsistent energy sector reform currently hinder energy project investment. Some parts of the energy sector, chiefly coal production, remain relatively closed to private and foreign investment, while others such as electric power, petroleum and other liquids, and natural gas have regulated price structures that discourage private investment.

Despite having large coal reserves and a healthy growth in natural gas production over the past two decades, India is increasingly dependent on imported fossil fuels. In 2013, India’s former petroleum and natural gas minister, Veerappa Moily, announced that his ministry would work on an action plan to make India energy independent by 2030 through increased fossil fuel production, development of resources such as coalbed methane and shale gas, foreign acquisitions by domestic Indian companies of upstream hydrocarbon reserves, reduced subsidies on motor fuels, and oil and natural gas pricing reforms. The current petroleum and natural gas minister, Dharmendra Pradhan, who took office in late May 2014, reiterated the goal of making India self-sufficient in energy resources. India is also looking to further develop and harness its various renewable energy sources. These actions would effectively increase India’s energy supply and create more efficiency in energy consumption. India already began implementing oil and gas pricing reforms over the past two years to foster sustainable investment and help lower subsidy costs.

Primary energy consumption in India has more than doubled between 1990 and 2012, reaching an estimated 32 quadrillion British thermal units (Btu). The country has the second-largest population in the world, at more than 1.2 billion people in 2012, growing about 1.3% each year since 2008, according to World Bank data. At the same time, India’s per capita energy consumption is one-third of the global average, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA), indicating potentially higher energy demand in the long term as the country continues its path of economic development. In the International Energy Outlook 2013, EIA projects India and China will account for about half of global energy demand growth through 2040, with India’s energy demand growing at 2.8% per year.

India’s largest energy source is coal, followed by petroleum and traditional biomass and waste. Since the beginning of the New Economic Policy in 1991, India’s population increasingly has moved to cities, and urban households have shifted away from traditional biomass and waste to other energy sources such as hydrocarbons, nuclear, biofuels, and other renewables. The power sector is the largest and fastest-growing area of energy demand, rising from 22% to 36% of total energy consumption between 1990 and 2011, according to the IEA. India’s National Sample Survey Organization estimates that about 25% of the population (over 300 million people) lack basic access to electricity, while electrified areas suffer from rolling electricity blackouts. The government seeks to balance the country’s growing need for electricity with environmental concerns from the use of coal and other energy sources to produce that electricity. India’s transportation sector, primarily fueled by petroleum products, is set to expand as the country focuses on improving road and railway transit. The government plans to mandate some alternative fuel use, particularly with biofuel blends, and develop greater use of mass transit systems to limit oil demand growth.

Petroleum and other liquids

India was the fourth-largest consumer of crude oil and petroleum products in the world in 2013, after the United States, China, and Japan. The country depends heavily on imported crude oil, mostly from the Middle East.

India was the fourth-largest consumer of oil and petroleum products after the United States, China, and Japan in 2013, and it was also the fourth-largest net importer of crude oil and petroleum products. The gap between India’s oil demand and supply is widening, as demand reached nearly 3.7 million barrels per day (bbl/d) in 2013 compared to less than 1 million bbl/d of total liquids production. EIA projects India’s demand will more than double to 8.2 million bbl/d by 2040, while domestic production will remain relatively flat, hovering around 1 million bbl/d. The high degree of dependence on imported crude oil has led Indian energy companies to diversify their supply sources. To this end, Indian national oil companies (NOCs) have purchased equity stakes in overseas oil and gas fields in South America, Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Caspian Sea region to acquire reserves and production capability. However, the majority of imports continue to come from the Middle East, where Indian companies have little direct access to investment.

Sector organization

India’s upstream petroleum liquids industry is still mainly owned by state-owned firms, although the sector is open for competition and attracts some level of private and foreign investment. The government regulates the fuel price for petroleum products, although the mounting costs of fuel subsidies in recent years have encouraged the government to lift retail price caps on some oil products.

Almost two decades after nationalizing the country’s hydrocarbon resources in the 1970s, the Indian government embarked on the New Economic Policy in 1991 that pushed for open market competition across a variety of energy sectors. The government introduced the New Exploration Licensing Policy (NELP) in 1999 that allowed investors to bid on development blocks with up to 100% foreign control. Currently, the government is preparing to issue the 10th round of bidding for the NELP after more than two years of awarding contracts for the 9th round of the NELP. The 9th round resulted in 13 contracts signed (1 for each block awarded) out of 34 blocks that were offered.

International investment is still relatively low, and most analysts agree that the NELP has had only limited success in reducing India’s oil dependence. India is offering 46 exploration blocks under the new NELP round, including 17 onshore, 15 shallow-water, and 14 deepwater blocks. The round was scheduled to officially open in February 2014, although the government is in the process of determining the structure of petroleum contracts between the government and companies. The current system includes a production-sharing mechanism allowing producers to recover exploration costs during production before sharing profits with the government.

The Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas (MOPNG) regulates the entire value chain of the oil sector, including exploration and production (E&P), refining, supply, and marketing. The ministry releases five-year plans that serve as rough guidelines to the energy sector. Under the MOPNG, the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons regulates the upstream side of the oil sector, as well as coalbed methane (CBM) projects. Another sub-ministry, the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board (PNGRB), acts as a downstream regulator, including petroleum product sales and distribution.

Until 2002, the government set the price of petroleum products through the Administered Pricing Mechanism (APM), which followed the principle of allowing a predetermined return (rather than market-based prices) on investments in the oil sector. After 2002, only certain products (namely kerosene and liquefied petroleum gases, or LPG, often used for cooking or home heating) remained regulated, while oil companies could set their own prices for other fuels. However, many oil marketing companies still set retail prices at below-market levels so they could claim under-recoveries (the difference between a global market price and the local price) from the Ministry of Finance for certain products at favorable rates. The government began domestic fuel price reform and officially deregulated gasoline prices in June 2010 (to take effect in 2012). High international oil prices in recent years and growing demand for oil products have increased the country’s fiscal deficit as a result of its mounting fuel subsidy bill. In January 2013, India began a phased deregulation of retail diesel prices each month to reduce some of the country’s subsidies.

Competition in the oil sector is now relatively open, particularly when it comes to the upstream market. On one hand, two state-owned companies, the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) and Oil India Limited (OIL), control the majority of production and refining activity in India. ONGC is India’s largest oil producer, accounting for about 69% of the domestic production in 2012 according to the company’s annual report. On the other hand, the government has slowly reduced its share of ownership in ONGC in an effort to raise revenue, and several private companies have emerged as important players in the past decade. Cairn India, a subsidiary of British company Cairn Energy, controls more than 20% of India’s crude oil production through its operation of major stakes in the Rajasthan and Gujarat regions and the Krishna-Godavari basin. Private companies like Reliance Industries (RIL) and Essar Oil have become major refiners. Other international oil companies have few stakes in the Indian oil market.

Exploration and production

India held nearly 5.7 billion barrels of proved oil reserves at the beginning of 2014, mostly in the western part of the country. Domestic production has not kept pace with demand in recent years, leading to exploration of deepwater and marginal fields and investment in improving recovery rates of existing fields. In addition, Indian national oil companies are purchasing more upstream stakes in overseas oil fields to increase supply security from imported crude oil.

According to the Oil & Gas Journal (OGJ), India held nearly 5.7 billion barrels of proved oil reserves at the beginning of 2014. About 44% of reserves are onshore resources, while 56% are offshore. Most reserves are found in the western part of India, particularly the Western offshore area near Gujarat and Rajasthan. The Assam-Arakan basin in the northeastern part of the country is also an important oil-producing region and contains more than 23% of the country’s reserves and 12% of the production.

Historically, ONGC dominated the upstream oil sector and relied on production from Mumbai High basin and its associated fields in the western offshore area. India’s total petroleum and other liquids production increase has been very gradual during the past two decades, growing at less than 2% total and peaking at 996,000 bbl/d in 2011. Production has declined slightly to 982,000 bbl/d in 2013. The Mumbai High, Gujarat, and Assam-Arakan basins contain mature fields experiencing production declines, although several redevelopment projects, enhanced oil recovery efforts, and marginal field development projects in these basins are underway to lift production by 2030.

Indian and foreign companies are investing in more frontier developments and marginal fields to help offset production declines from mature basins. In recent years, major discoveries in the Barmer basin in Rajasthan and the offshore Krishna-Godavari basin by smaller companies such as Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation and Andhra Pradesh Gas Infrastructure Corporation hold some potential to diversify the country’s production.

India’s relatively small land-based resource endowment means companies require more upstream technical expertise to tap into offshore reserves, especially in technically challenging deepwater reserves. Foreign companies historically took the lead in exploring new offshore opportunities. For example, Cairn India brought online the largest field, Mangala, of the RJ-ON-90/1 block in Barmer basin in 2009, with a production capacity of 130,000 bbl/d. The Rajasthan fields, including Mangala, produced 179,000 bbl/d in 2013, according to FACTS Global Energy (FGE), and Cairn India reports production from the fields could peak at 300,000 bbl/d. Despite Cairn’s successful drilling in Rajasthan, foreign investment in India has waned in recent years, both because of increased competition from domestic Indian companies and India’s complex exploration and production laws.

The government has encouraged companies to acquire overseas upstream assets as a way to shield the domestic energy sector from global price volatility. Indian companies hold large stakes in Sudan’s GNOP block, Russia’s Sakhalin-1 project, and Venezuela’s San Cristobal and Carabobo blocks. Amerada Hess Corporation sold key oil fields in Azerbaijan to ONGC in 2012. Also, ONGC, OIL, and RIL have taken stakes in gas plays in Mozambique, shale gas assets in the United States and Canada, and oil and gas assets in Myanmar, and the companies are actively pursuing other overseas upstream deals. In 2011, several government agencies agreed to establish a sovereign wealth fund that could also aid in financing overseas energy acquisitions.

Downstream and refining

India’s government promotes the country’s refining sector, and India became a net exporter of petroleum products in 2001. India has several world-class refineries, and the private sector has significant investments in the country’s refining industry.

India’s government started encouraging energy companies to invest in refineries at the end of the 1990s, and the investment helped the country become a net exporter of petroleum products in 2001. In particular, the government eliminated customs duties on crude imports, lowering the cost of fuel supply for refiners. These reforms made domestic production of petroleum products more economic for Indian companies. In its 11th Five Year Plan (2007-2012), India’s government set the goal of making India a global exporting hub of refined products.

However, India still imports kerosene and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) products for domestic use, and some export-oriented refineries began reorienting production for domestic use in 2009 to help ease shortages of motor gasoline, gasoil, kerosene, and LPG. These products make up 73% of India’s petroleum product consumption, according to FGE. In particular, many rural areas of India use LPG and kerosene along with traditional biomass as cooking fuels (see Biomass and Waste below). The government is encouraging a shift from kerosene used in cooking fuel in rural areas to LPG, a cleaner and less-expensive fuel. Liquid fuels have competed with natural gas in the past few years as the power and fertilizer industries are using natural gas as a substitute for some naphtha and fuel oil supply. Diesel remains the most-consumed oil product, accounting for 42% of petroleum product consumption in 2013.

The refining industry is an important part of India’s economy, and the private sector owns about 38% of total capacity. At the end of 2013, India had 4.35 million bbl/d of refining capacity, making it the second-largest refiner in Asia after China, according to FGE. The two largest refineries by crude capacity, located in the Jamnagar complex in Gujarat, are world-class export facilities and are owned by Reliance Industries. The Jamnagar refineries account for 29% of India’s current capacity. These refineries are close to crude oil-producing regions in the Middle East, which allows them to take advantage of lower transportation costs.

India projects an increase of the country’s refining capacity to 6.3 million bbl/d by 2017 based on its current five-year plan to meet rising domestic demand and export markets, although this projection hinges on all proposed projects becoming operational. Some refinery projects have faced delays in the past few years, and there is now greater competition within Asia from countries such as China that has built large refineries able to process more complex crude oil types. Two refineries, Paradip in Odisha and Cuddalore in the southern state of Tamil Nadu, are scheduled to be operational by 2015, adding 420,000 bbl/d of capacity. Also, refiners have plans to upgrade several existing refineries to produce higher-quality auto fuels to comply with more stringent specifications for vehicle fuel standards. India plans to adopt the equivalent of Euro IV fuel efficiency standards on a nationwide basis by 2015 and Euro V standards on passenger cars by 2016. Refineries have proposed several expansions to existing facilities and a few new refineries by 2020, although the timeline of these projects depends on economic recovery and fuel sales in both domestic and export markets.

Trade

India is a significant importer of crude oil, as the country’s demand growth continues to outstrip domestic supply growth. The Middle East was the major source of crude oil imports to India in 2013, although the Western Hemisphere’s share has risen in recent years.

India has increased its total net oil imports from 42% of demand in 1990 to an estimated 71% of demand in 2012. India’s demand for crude oil and petroleum products is projected to continue rising, barring a serious global economic recession. Oil import dependence will continue to climb if India fails to achieve production growth equal to demand growth.

The Indian Ocean historically has been a major transit route, bringing crude oil from suppliers in the Persian Gulf and Africa to markets in Asia. Tanker sea lanes pass near Indian waters between major chokepoints such as the Strait of Malacca and the Strait of Hormuz (see the World Oil Transit Chokepoints report). The majority of Indian oil ports are located on the country’s western side to receive shipments of crude oil that passes through these routes.

India’s crude oil imports reached nearly 3.9 million bbl/d in 2013, according to Global Trade Atlas. Saudi Arabia is India’s largest oil supplier, with a 20% share of crude oil imports. In total, approximately 62% of India’s imported crude oil came from Middle East countries. The second-biggest source of imports is the Western Hemisphere (19%), with the majority of that crude oil coming from Venezuela. Africa contributed 16% of India’s crude oil imports. Supply disruptions in several countries, including Iran, Libya, Sudan, and Nigeria, in tandem with India’s growing dependence on imported crude oil, have compelled India to diversify its crude oil import slate. Iran accounted for 5.5% of India’s crude imports in 2013, down from 8.3% in 2011-12 as a result of the U.S. and European sanctions imposed on Iranian oil exports. Also, Indian refiners are trying to reduce crude oil import costs by purchasing less expensive crude oil. Prices of Middle Eastern crude oil grades in the past year have been high relative to prices of oil from the Western Hemisphere, prompting Indian companies to import more crude oil from Latin America, primarily from Venezuela, Colombia, and Mexico.

Despite being a net importer of crude oil, India has become a net exporter of petroleum products by investing in refineries designed for export, particularly in Gujarat. Essar Oil and RIL export naphtha, motor gasoline, and gasoil to the international market, particularly to Singapore, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and the Netherlands. Reliance Industries has also targeted U.S. markets and leased storage space in New York harbor in 2008. However, the government encourages the companies to focus on supplying domestic markets before selling abroad.

Pipelines and infrastructure

According to the Ministry of Oil and Natural Gas, India’s crude oil pipeline network spans just under 5,900 miles and has a total capacity of 2.8 million bbl/d. Approximately 30 terminals, mostly on the northwest coast, take in crude oil imports. Pipelines run from these ports and producing areas (particularly from Gujarat) to major oil refineries in Gujarat, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, and Haryana. On the eastern part of the country, pipelines run from West Bengal to the Paradip oil refinery. Refineries are generally located in coastal areas, because the majority of crude oil comes from tanker imports and offshore fields. Central and southern areas have few major pipelines, because the bulk of refining capacity is in the northwest and northeast.

The Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) controls and operates the oil product pipelines and supplies most of the oil products going to the domestic market. Oil product pipelines cluster in the north and northeast parts of India, while central and southern areas must rely on oil distributed through other means, such as cargo trucks. IOC plans to build additional crude oil and product lines including one to move supplies from its Paradip refinery in the eastern Odisha state to growing demand centers in Odisha and adjacent states of Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh.

Strategic petroleum reserve

In 2005, the Indian Government decided to set up strategic storage of 37 million barrels of crude oil at three locations (Visakhapatnam, Mangalore, and Padur). The Indian Strategic Petroleum Reserves Limited (ISPRL), a special purpose legal entity owned by the Oil Industry Development Board, would manage the proposed facilities, which are expected to be completed by 2015. The government unveiled plans to add another 91 million barrels to the state’s crude oil capacity to protect India from supply disruptions by 2017. The country anticipates having crude oil stocks to cover 90 days of the country’s oil demand by 2020.

Natural gas

Natural gas serves as a substitute for coal in electricity generation and fertilizer production in India. The country began importing liquefied natural gas from Qatar in 2004 and increasingly relies on imports to meet domestic natural gas needs.

Natural gas mainly serves as a substitute for coal for electricity generation and as an alternative for LPG and other petroleum products in the fertilizer and other sectors. The country was self-sufficient in natural gas until 2004, when it began to import liquefied natural gas (LNG) from Qatar. Because it has not been able to create sufficient natural gas infrastructure on a national level or produce adequate domestic natural gas to meet domestic demand, India increasingly relies on imported LNG. India was the world’s fourth-largest LNG importer in 2013, following Japan, South Korea, and China, and consumed almost 6% of the global market, according to data from IHS Energy. Indian companies hold both long-term supply contracts and more expensive spot LNG contracts.

Natural gas consumption has grown at an annual rate of 8% from 2000 and 2012, although supply disruptions starting in 2011 resulted in declining consumption. Natural gas consumption in India was tied closely to domestic production until imports became available in 2004. In 2012, India consumed 2.1 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of natural gas. LNG imports accounted for about 29% of 2012 demand, and LNG is expected to account for an increasing portion of demand at least in the next several years as Indian energy firms attempt to reverse the country’s recent domestic production declines. Increasing LNG imports will depend on the pace of expansion in regasification terminal capacity and pipeline infrastructure connecting gas to markets that currently lack access. The country’s pricing system is undergoing revision to unlock regulated prices that are well below the import price levels. Raising gas prices would provide oil and gas firms with economic incentives for upstream development, especially in deepwater plays and technically challenging fields, and would allow LNG importers to compete more effectively for gas consumers in a higher-priced environment.

The majority of natural gas demand in 2012 came from the power sector (33%), the fertilizer industry (28%), and the replacement of LPG for cooking oil and other uses in the residential sector (15%), according to India’s MOPNG. The government has labeled these as priority sectors for domestic programs, which ensures that they receive larger shares of any new gas supply before other consumers. The fertilizer sector, which is highly price-sensitive, has been able to maintain low fuel costs by using natural gas. The recent unexpected natural gas production declines since 2011 have forced electric generators to seek fuel alternatives, primarily coal. The government is promoting the use of natural gas in the residential sector as an alternative to LPG as a cooking fuel.

Sector organization

In 2013, India began natural gas pricing reforms, and the government approved a new pricing scheme to further align domestic prices with international market prices and to raise investment for the sector.

As with the oil sector, India’s Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas (MOPNG) oversees natural gas exploration and production activities. MOPNG’s Directorate of Hydrocarbons functions as an upstream regulator and monitors coalbed methane projects. Until 2006, the Gas Authority of India Limited (GAIL) functioned as a near-monopoly operating India’s natural gas pipelines.

However, the government began to reform gas pricing and created the Petroleum Natural Gas Regulatory Board to regulate downstream activities such as distribution and marketing.

Different producers of natural gas have different pricing schemes in India. The government directly sets prices for public sector companies through the Administered Price Mechanism (APM), while joint-venture producers generally index their prices to international rates. LNG prices are completely market-driven and are about triple the price of the APM benchmark on average. The Indian government approved a new natural gas pricing regime in June 2013 in an effort to attract investment critical to increase domestic gas production and mitigate upstream project delays. Most of India’s gas consumers pay rates that are much lower than the prices of imported gas. The proposed pricing scheme would more closely align India’s gas prices to international market rates and attempt to create a more uniform pricing structure. The current APM benchmark rate of $4.20 per million Btu would double under the new formula, according to industry sources. Although the pricing scheme was slated to take effect on April 1, 2014, India’s oil ministry delayed the price increase until after the country’s general elections when the new government is expected to review the new pricing system and determine its course of action.

New private companies such as Petronet LNG Limited have formed in recent years aiming to benefit from growing LNG imports in India by building regasification plants. Privately-owned RIL emerged as an important upstream player in the natural gas market after discovering significant reserves in the Krishna-Godavari basin in 2002. RIL also operates the important East-West gas pipeline from Andhra Pradesh to Gujarat.

International firms have some stake in the natural gas sector. BP owns part of the KG-D6 field in the Krishna-Godavari basin, and Royal Dutch Shell has invested in potential future LNG facilities.

Exploration and production

India had 47 trillion cubic feet of natural gas reserves at the beginning of 2014, mostly located offshore. The two largest state-owned oil companies, ONGC and Oil India, dominate the country’s upstream gas sector.

According to the Oil & Gas Journal, India had 47 Tcf of proved natural gas reserves at the beginning of 2014. About 34% of total reserves are located onshore, while 66% are offshore, according to India’s Ministry of Oil and Gas. In 2002, energy companies made a number of large gas discoveries in the Krishna-Godavari (KG) basin off of India’s eastern coast, pushing up both the reserve base and production. However, production from some of the more mature fields have declined in recent years, and RIL cut the recoverable reserves of its two major gas fields in the major D6 block (D1 and D3) in the KG basin from 10.3 Tcf estimated in December 2006 to 3.1 Tcf in 2012 because of unexpected declines and reservoir performance problems.

Total gas production in India amounted to around 1.5 Tcf in 2012. The two biggest state-owned companies, ONGC and Oil India Ltd. (OIL), dominate India’s upstream gas sector. ONGC operates the Mumbai High Field, which provides a large amount of India’s natural gas supply. ONGC remains India’s largest natural gas producer, accounting for 62% of the domestic production in 2012 as reported in the company’s annual report. However, the government has encouraged private and foreign companies to enter the upstream sector in recent years. RIL is becoming a major upstream force because of natural gas discoveries in the Krishna-Godavari basin. RIL has a strategic partnership with BP, which has a 30% stake in 21 of RIL’s production-sharing contracts. Other major international oil companies do not have significant investments in India’s natural gas upstream sector. India’s MOPNG estimates that gas production continued to decline during 2013.

The KG-D6 field came online in early 2009, ramping up production to hit a peak of more than 2.4 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) or 876 Bcf per year (Bcf/y), in 2010. However, the field has experienced production shortfalls in recent years, and output dropped to 0.4 Bcf/d (146 Bcf/y) at the end of 2013. RIL and BP plan to tie in production from satellite fields and invest $5-10 billion to restore the production of the D6 block to more than 2.1 Bcf/d (767 Bcf/y) by 2020.

ONGC and Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation Limited (GSPCL) are also developing several offshore areas in Krishna-Godavari basin. Another promising producing area is the Cambay basin in western India, where independent company Oilex has done some preliminary work assessing the potential for tight natural gas.

Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas

India began awarding coalbed methane (CBM) blocks for exploration in 2001, although it has taken more than a decade to begin producing at these fields. The Indian Ministry of Oil partnered with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and ONGC to conduct a resource assessment and estimates anywhere between 9 and 92 Tcf of CBM resources both onshore and offshore India. Foreign companies have largely been absent from CBM production, leaving domestic Indian companies struggling to attract enough expertise and technology to develop these resources. Great Eastern Energy Corporation (GEEC) has developed the Raniganj block in West Bengal, with an estimated 1 Tcf of gas potential. Essar Oil and RIL have also been developing blocks in Bengal, although there has not been any significant commercial production. Total CBM production in 2013 amounted to about 5.8 Bcf.

Companies are interested in exploring the Cambay basin in Gujarat, the Assam-Arakan basin in northeast India, and the Gondwana basin in Central India for shale gas resources, although there has been no commercial production or publicly released reserve figures. In its 2013 assessment of global shale gas reserves, EIA estimates India has 96 Tcf of technically recoverable shale gas reserves. Joshi Technologies made the first shale oil discovery in Cambay Basin in mid-2010. India’s oil ministry announced that the government will unveil a shale gas and oil policy in the near future and will begin to sell shale gas development blocks, although it has not made any awards to date.

Pipelines and infrastructure

The two most important companies operating India’s large gas pipeline system are GAIL and Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited (RGTIL). GAIL, the state-owned gas transmission and marketing company, operates two major gas pipelines in northwestern India with a combined length of 3,328 miles: the Hazira-Vijaipur-Jagadishpur (HVJ) line running from Gujarat to Delhi, and the Dahej-Vijaipur (DVPL) line. The company services primarily the northwestern region of India and makes up over 70% of the country’s pipeline network. Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure (RGTIL, owned by RIL) is the biggest private investor in the gas transmission structure and brought the 881-mile East-West pipeline online in 2009 to link the promising KG-D6 gas field to GAIL’s pipeline network and demand centers in the northern and western regions. However, RIL’s East-West pipeline remains relatively underutilized as a result of lower-than-expected production from the KG-D6 field. Other players like Assam Gas Company and Gujarat State Petronet Limited (GSPL) have significant pipeline assets that service regional demand centers in northeastern India and Gujarat, respectively.

Insufficient pipeline infrastructure and lack of a nationally integrated system are key factors that constrain natural gas demand in India, although GAIL and other companies are investing in several pipeline projects. The country’s natural gas pipeline network totaled over 9,200 miles in 2013, and the current Five Year Plan proposes expanding the gas network to 18,000 miles by 2017. GAIL plans to expand its network and further integrate southern India with the pipeline system in the northwest of the country. In early 2013, GAIL commissioned the 600-mile Dabhol to Bengaluru (Bangalore) pipeline, the first line to connect the southern part of the country to the national grid. GAIL also plans to build a pipeline from its newly commissioned LNG regasification terminal at Kochi in southwestern India to Mangalore and other parts of southern India, although regulatory and land rights issues have delayed the project.

The Indian government has considered importing natural gas via pipeline through several international projects, although many of these have proved unfeasible. In 2005, negotiations over a transnational pipeline between the Indian and Bangladesh governments fell through. In 2006, India withdrew from the Iran-Pakistan-India (IPI) pipeline project. However, the government still participates in a pipeline project to import natural gas from Turkmenistan to India. The Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) project, also known as the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline, has seen a decade of discussion, although major geopolitical risks and technical challenges have prevented the project from actually starting. However, the countries have made some progress in moving TAPI forward. The partners signed a framework agreement in 2010 and agreed on unified transit tariffs for the route in early 2012. In May 2012, India signed gas supply and purchase agreements with Turkmenistan. In early February 2013, India’s government approved a special-purpose legal entity to which participating members of the pipeline would contribute investment funds. In November 2013, the four participants appointed the Asian Development Bank (ADB) as the project’s technical and financial advisor. The ADB estimated the pipeline’s cost at about $10-12 billion.

Liquefied natural gas

Indian companies are investing in new regasification facilities to meet the country’s rising natural gas demand. India was the world’s fourth-largest liquefied natural gas importer in 2013.

Liquefied natural gas (LNG) has become an important part of India’s energy portfolio since the country began importing it from Qatar in 2004. In 2013, India was the world’s fourth-largest LNG importer, importing 638 Bcf, or 6%, of global trade, according to data from IHS Energy. Petronet, a joint venture between GAIL, ONGC, IOC, and several foreign firms, is the major importer of LNG supplies to India. Petronet owns two existing LNG terminals, Dahej (480 Bcf/y) and Kochi (120 Bcf/y). Shell (74% share) and Total (26% share) jointly own the Hazira terminal (240 Bcf/y), which operates as a merchant facility, importing only short-term and spot cargoes at present. India’s total regasification capacity now stands at 936 Bcf, and terminal owners have proposed capacity expansions at all existing terminals. Expansion under construction at Dahej will increase the terminal’s capacity to 720 Bcf by 2016.

Unexpected production declines in India’s KG-D6 gas field mean the country must rely on higher LNG imports. Average imported LNG prices have increased to three times the price of domestically produced natural gas because they are not subject to the government setting prices through the Administered Price Mechanism (see Sector Organization). Indian producers such as RIL have asked the government to raise the wellhead price for gas (the wholesale price at the point of production) as a way of justifying investment into deepwater projects. If the proposed gas pricing reform is implemented, there will be greater investment incentives for domestic gas development that could increase competition for LNG imports.

Indian companies have invested in increasing the country’s LNG regasification capacity in recent years to meet rising demand. In early 2013, GAIL, NTPC, and several other smaller players restarted the Dabhol project, originally proposed by now-defunct Enron, which includes a regasification terminal to fuel three gas-fired power stations. Dabhol LNG also ships natural gas to southern India through the new pipeline to Bengaluru. GAIL is installing a breakwater facility to double Dabhol’s capacity by 2017. Petronet’s LNG terminal at Kochi was commissioned in late 2013. However, the terminal is experiencing low utilization because of delays in the approval and construction of a proposed pipeline to Mangalore and other parts of southern India, according to PFC Energy. The eastern side of India lacks pipeline infrastructure and gas supply following declines in the KG basin; thus companies are quickly planning terminals to come online in the next few years. IOC proposed the Ennore project in Tamil Nadu in southeastern India. Other proposed projects are located along India’s eastern coast include three floating terminal projects at Kakinada and one at Gangavaram. Several proposed regasification projects along the western coast include GSPC’s Mundra terminal in Gujarat, expected to be built by 2016.

Qatar’s RasGas is India’s sole long-term supplier of natural gas, with two contracts for a total of 360 Bcf. In 2013, Qatar was the source of 84% of India’s total LNG imports, according to IHS Energy. India has been an active importer of spot cargoes following interruptions in the KG-D6 field production after 2010 and began receiving LNG cargoes from a variety of exporting countries. Nigeria, Egypt, and Yemen have become India’s largest short-term LNG suppliers.

Indian LNG importers actively sought supply from various new LNG sources and signed several short- and long-term purchase agreements in the past few years. India signed agreements to receive supply from Australia’s Gorgon LNG terminal and several U.S. terminals (Sabine Pass, Cove Point, and Main Pass) and from the portfolio of various global LNG suppliers such as BG, GDF Suez, Gas Natural Fenosa, and Gazprom. As Indian companies become more active in pursuing overseas upstream oil and gas plays, OIL has invested in gas projects in Canada (Pacific Northwest LNG) and an offshore gas project in Mozambique (jointly with ONGC) to secure LNG imports for India.

Coal

Coal is India’s primary source of energy. The country has the world’s fifth-largest coal reserves, and ranked third largest in terms of both production and consumption in 2012. The state retains a near-monopoly on the coal sector. The power sector makes up the majority of coal consumption.

Coal is India’s primary source of energy, and the country was the third-largest global consumer in 2012. The country has the fifth-largest coal reserves in the world. At the same time, the coal sector is one of the most centralized and inefficient sectors in India. Two state-owned companies have a near-monopoly on production and distribution. The country also faces a widening gap between demand and supply. Although production has moderately increased by about 4% per year since 2007, producers have failed to reach the government’s production targets. Meanwhile, demand grew more than 7% annually between 2007 and 2012, and reached 826 million short tons in 2012. Because coal production cannot keep pace with demand, particularly from the power sector, India has met more of its coal needs with imports.

The power sector is the largest consumer of coal, accounting for 69% of coal consumption in 2011, according to the IEA. Because power plants rely so heavily on coal, coal shortages are a major contributor to shortfalls in electricity generation and consequent blackouts throughout the country. Also, coal demand has escalated in the past few years from the power sector, which encountered problems accessing natural gas supply and lower hydroelectricity-sourced generation during the weak monsoon season in 2012.

Steel and cement industries are also significant coal consumers. India has limited reserves of coking coal, which is an important raw material for steel production. The state of Jharkhand holds most of India’s coking coal reserves, but it does not supply enough to meet the industry’s needs. Because of this shortage, India imports large quantities of coking coal from abroad.

Sector organization

India’s government took control of the country’s coal reserves with the 1973 Coal Mines Nationalization Act, establishing Coal India Limited (CIL) in 1975 as the state-owned sole producer and aggregating coal production and investment. After 1993 it tried to encourage foreign and private investment into the coal sector through the National Mineral Policy. By 2000, the government deregulated coal prices, allowing CIL and other companies to increase prices when there is a rise in the cost of production. However, the Ministry of Coal and Mines continues to control the distribution of coal resources and subsidies to various companies. In 2007, the government passed the New Coal Distribution Policy that attempted to allocate limited coal supplies to priority sectors, particularly the power and fertilizer industries, and India’s 12th Five Year Plan calls for CIL to link indigenous coal production with part of the fuel requirements of power plant projects coming online by 2017.

CIL remains the country’s largest coal producer; and they produced about 81% of the country’s coal in 2012, according to the IEA. CIL underwent an initial public offering (IPO) in 2010 and divested 10% of its government share, India’s largest IPO to date. Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), another public-owned company, was responsible for nearly 10% of the country’s coal production in 2012, mainly to the southern region of the country, according to India’s Ministry of Coal. Other smaller companies operate throughout the country.

Exploration and production

India ranks as the third-largest coal producer in the world. However, the country continues to experience regulatory, land acquisition, technical, and distribution challenges that limit production growth and create bottlenecks hindering efficient transportation of coal to key demand centers.

India had 66.8 billion short tons of proven coal reserves in 2011, the fifth-largest in the world (third-largest reserves in anthracite and bituminous after the United States and China), according to the World Energy Council. The Indian Ministry of Coal estimated proven reserves to be 137 billion short tons in 2012. Indian coal typically has high ash, low sulfur content, and a low-to-medium calorific value.

Most coal reserves are located in the eastern parts of the country. Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, and Odisha account for approximately 64% of the country’s coal reserves, according to the IEA. Other significant coal-producing states include West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Maharashtra.

India is the third-largest global coal producer, with coal output nearly doubling between 2000 and 2012 to 650 million short tons. Despite its sizeable reserves and rising production, India has increasing supply shortages and systemic problems with its mining industry. According to an IEA report, about 90% of the country’s coal mines are opencast, or surface, mines (less than 1,000 feet deep), which is more cost-effective and less dangerous for workers but causes more environmental impact. India lacks more advanced technology to engage in large-scale underground mining operations, which keeps productivity levels low. A lack of competition within the coal sector inhibits private and foreign investment that could be used to improve underground mining techniques. Also, many coal deposits are located in areas that pose environmental issues or potential dislocation of people. Regulatory hurdles continue to pose delays in obtaining environmental and land acquisition approvals for mining companies.

India’s coal mines are also located far from the highest-demand markets in southern and western India, posing a significant logistical challenge to coal producers and distributors. Railcars transport the majority of Indian coal, according to CIL. Limited railway capacity, delays to railroad projects, and high transport costs to demand centers are other factors negatively affecting India’s coal output and deliveries to users.

Trade

Although traditionally not a major importer of coal, India has imported small volumes of coking coal for over two decades to meet high demand in the steel and iron industry. The country’s recent supply shortages spurred India’s significant increase of coal imports over the past few years from several key exporting countries. India purchased 179 million short tons from overseas and was the third-largest coal importer behind China and Japan in 2012. India imports thermal (steam) coal used in power plants mainly from Indonesia and South Africa and coking coal for steel production from Australia. Indonesia is the largest source of coal imports to India, accounting for 55% of total coal imports in 2012.

Electricity

India had 249 gigawatts of installed electricity generation capacity connected to the national network in early 2014, mostly coal-powered plants. Because of insufficient fuel supply and power generation and transmission capacity, the country suffers from a severe electricity shortage, leading to rolling blackouts.

As of May 2014, India had 249 gigawatts (GW) of utility-based installed electricity generating capacity, mostly from coal-fired power plants, according to India’s Central Electricity Authority (CEA). Generation capacity from smaller captive power plants, or those that serve specific industries for in-house consumption and may not be connected to the grid, registered about 39 GW in 2014. According to the IEA, installed capacity from coal and natural gas power plants is heavily clustered in the more populated western region of the country, particularly in Maharashtra and Gujarat. For example, Maharashtra, the largest Indian state by GDP (its capital is Mumbai, the country’s largest city), contains 14% of the nation’s generating capacity. Hydropower is the second largest source of electricity, accounting for 16% of India’s utility-based installed capacity in early 2014 and supplying about 13% of the country’s electricity in 2011. The industrial sector has been a key driver of electricity consumption in the past decade, as a result of India’s rapidly expanding economy.

India suffers from severe shortages of electricity, particularly during peak hours of demand, and often experiences shut-downs lasting from several hours to days in certain areas. India suffered an unprecedented electricity blackout for two days in July 2012 that affected an estimated 680 million people across the country’s northern states. This outage highlights the increasing pressure on India’s power system to secure more fuel supplies and infrastructure investment in each stage of power transmission. Utilization rates in Indian power plants using fossil fuels have fallen steadily since 2007 (from a peak of nearly 79%) to about 70% in 2013 because of disruptions in steady domestic fuel supplies and transmission and distribution constraints, according to the IEA and India’s CEA. Deficiencies in coal and natural gas supply to power plants have caused some plant owners to curtail operations and even mothball some plants. Transmission and distribution losses and technical problems in moving electricity between various states also impair system reliability.

Other factors contributing to power shortages are the lag of power capacity expansions and the need to replace older, less efficient units. India has historically fallen short of its capacity addition targets for electricity, although the country has successfully attracted private investment for power plant construction in the past decade. In its 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17), India plans to add 120 GW of power capacity to the grid, with more than half of it composed of coal-fired generation capacity. By early 2014, more than a third of this capacity had been brought online.

In efforts to diversify the generation portfolio and offset some carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel sources, the government is promoting renewable energy use, with a 32-GW planned capacity expansion from sources such as wind, solar, biomass, and waste during the current Five Year Plan. For instance, India launched a national solar mission with a goal of adding 22 GW of solar capacity by 2022.

In addition, significant parts of the country, particularly in rural areas, do not have access to electricity. The Indian government reported overall household electrification in India was 75%, representing more than 300 million people without electricity, in 2011. While 94% of urban households had electricity, only 67% of rural households had access, and often the rural consumers experienced much more frequently interrupted electricity supply. The government began a program in 2005 called Rajiv Gandhi Grameen Vidyutikaran Yojana to provide all villages electricity within five years through significant investments in rural electrification. While the program has succeeded in electrifying many rural areas, power supply is unreliable and frequent blackouts persist.

Sector organization

The Ministry of Power is responsible for planning and implementing India’s power sector policy, with various subunits handling different parts of the sector, including thermal, hydropower, and distribution. The CEA advises the central government on long- and short-term policy planning. The Central Electricity Regulatory Commission and State Electricity Regulatory Commissions set generation and transmission policies.

The source of India’s current electricity regulatory framework is the 2003 Electricity Act, which attempted to reform the state electricity boards, open access to transmission and distribution networks, and create state electricity regulatory commissions (SERCs) to manage electricity on a regional basis. Several key private investors, namely Reliance Power, Tata Power, and Essar Power, have entered India’s power generation sector, and the share of private sector to state-run generation capacity is on the rise. The government has not fully implemented many parts of the Act, and India’s electricity sector continues to face serious challenges in procurement and distribution of sufficient fuel for generation.

Power tariffs for end-users are highly regulated and kept low for the residential and agricultural sectors. Low retail prices often do not match higher generation costs, triggering financial losses for transmission and distribution companies and lower investment in electricity distribution. Higher costs from imported fuels and price swings in international fuel markets create financial constraints for power producers who cannot pass full costs to some of their customers. In order to mitigate supply risk from fuel sources with high price volatility and reduce carbon dioxide emissions growth, India’s government is encouraging more generation from renewable energy sources.

The government established the Power Grid Corporation of India (POWERGRID) to operate five regional electricity grids, while state transmission utilities (with some private sector participation) run most transmission and distribution segments. Although the central government finances electricity development projects, delivering electricity to customers is the responsibility of state governments. Therefore, more-efficient states such as Maharashtra tend to have better electricity availability. The southern grid was integrated with the other four grids at the end of 2013, creating a more unified national grid. However, the transmission sector still requires substantial investment for capacity expansion as well as improved grid management to ensure power supply reliability across states and to reduce technical losses in transmission and distribution.

Different states also have varying energy mixes based on their natural resource endowment. For example, Gujarat is close to major gas fields and LNG terminals, allowing regional power plants to use a larger share of natural gas. Renewable power generation is concentrated in a few states so far. Wind power generation, which makes up the bulk of non hydroelectric renewable capacity, is found in southern states such as Tamil Nadu, and solar power generation is located in Gujarat and Rajasthan. Hydroelectricity is located mostly in the northeastern states.

Fossil fuels

Fossil fuel generation, mostly from coal, accounted for about 81% of total electricity generation in the country in 2011. Coal-fired power plants dominate India’s electricity generation sector and accounted for nearly 148 GW (or 59%) of the utility-based installed capacity in early 2014. India plans to add more than 72 GW in fossil fuel-fired power capacity to the grid, with almost 70 GW from coal-fired stations, between 2012 and 2017. The government is attracting private investment for its Ultra-Mega Power Plants Program, which involves installing large-scale, coal-fired supercritical plants that are more energy-efficient for plant operations. Many of these plants are under construction, and about half of the proposed coal-fired capacity slated to come online during the 12th Five Year Plan (through 2017) are designed with more advanced technology. To alleviate fuel transportation constraints, these plants will be located near domestic coal supplies and the coasts to accommodate imports.

Natural gas fuels most of the remaining share of fossil fuel-fired electricity generation. After the newly developed Krishna Godavari basin (including the KG-D6 field) began producing significant amounts of natural gas and India began importing LNG during the past decade, natural gas use in power began to rise. Since 2011, natural gas-fired generation has waned, and some plants have ceased operation since the KG-D6 field production began to decline. Natural gas-fired generation capacity was nearly 23 GW in early 2014, or 9% of total generation capacity. The government’s expansion plans for gas-fired capacity through 2017 are much lower compared to other fuel sources. It plans to use natural gas-fired power as a supply source for peak requirements.

Hydroelectric

India was the world’s seventh-largest producer of hydroelectric power in 2012, with 115 billion kilowatthours generated. Total utility-based installed capacity of hydropower in early 2014 was nearly 41 GW, according to the CEA.

India benefits from a tropical climate, which gives the country increased hydropower potential, particularly during the summer months. In particular, states with significant river systems such as Himachal Pradesh, Jammu, Kashmir, and Uttarakhand benefit from energy surpluses as a result of abundant precipitation during the monsoon period. However, coal and natural gas generation is related inversely to hydropower capacity; when hydropower utilization falls, for example with a weak monsoon season, coal-fired power plants will generate more electricity to compensate for the shortfall. In 2012, India experienced a drought during the summer and saw a dip in hydroelectric generation which reversed in 2013 when the monsoon season was stronger than normal.

Nuclear

India has 20 operational nuclear reactors at six nuclear power plants with a generation capacity of 4.8 GW, representing about 2% of total utility-based generation capacity. The Kudankulam plant in the southern state of Tamil Nadu was connected to the electricity grid at the end of 2013 and is expected to become operational in mid-2014 according to the Nuclear Power Corporation of India, adding another 1 GW to the country’s nuclear capacity. As of April 2014, six additional reactors with a combined 4.3 GW of capacity are under construction and expected to come online by 2017. As India seeks reliable electricity supply to accommodate its swiftly growing power demand, the government has indicated that it plans to increase the nuclear share of total generation from 3% in 2011 to 25% by 2050.

In September 2008, India became a party to the Nuclear Suppliers’ Group agreement, which opened access to nuclear technology and expertise through several cooperative agreements. The government has signed several such agreements with countries including the United States, Russia, France, the United Kingdom, South Korea, and Canada. In addition, India gained access to reactor parts and uranium fuel from other countries as a result of these agreements.

Indians protested nuclear power after the Fukushima disaster in Japan, and the government responded by organizing safety audits for existing reactors. The Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) conducted stress tests of all nuclear power plants. The Indian government has a three-stage nuclear development plan to gradually shift from powering reactors with natural uranium to accumulating reserves of other fissile materials such as thorium. While the Indian nuclear sector historically has had limited access to uranium, it has abundant thorium reserves that can power more sophisticated reactors. India’s commitment to the thorium fuel cycle sets it apart from most nations with nuclear power programs.

Biomass and waste

The lack of electricity in some parts of India results in a substantial use of traditional biomass and waste products primarily for household uses in rural areas. A small portion of biomass and bagasse contributes to power plant feedstock.

Rural areas of India tend to rely on traditional biomass (including firewood, animal dung, and agricultural residue) for cooking, heating, and lighting because they lack access to other energy supplies. These sources can be burned directly to produce heat and electricity.

Large parts of India rely on biomass as the primary fuel for cooking. According to the 2011 India census, 62.5% of rural households use firewood as the primary fuel for cooking, 12.3% use crop residue as the primary cooking fuel, and 10.9% use dung. By contrast, more than 3% of urban households use crop residue and dung, and only 20% use firewood as the primary fuel source for cooking. These uses can cause health problems from exposure to waste products and pollution or environmental problems when forests or crops are harvested unsustainably. On the whole, about 66% of India’s total population used traditional biomass for cooking purposes in 2011, according to the IEA.

India also uses biomass in the power sector. According to the CEA, India had at least 3.4 GW of utility-based installed capacity in biomass power and bagasse-based cogeneration plants as of mid-2013. India’s Ministry of New and Renewable Energy reports the country has 18 GW of potential biomass electricity generation capacity and 5 GW of potential bagasse-based generation. A large amount of biomass used for electricity generation comes from bagasse (crushed sugarcane or sorghum stalks), which can be used in combustion-powered generators. Biodiesel and other liquid biofuels consumption in India is fairly low and mostly comes from several states that mandate 5% blending of ethanol in gasoline.

Source: eurasiareview